28 February 2024

Unlocking Our History: The Triumphs of Reclaim the Records

Image by Mariann Szőke from Pixabay
Sometimes, we hit the proverbial brick wall. Especially for those of use who primarily research online, it's the point where records seem to evaporate. Maybe it's a record for an ancestor from long ago. Or maybe it's for someone closer in time. The reasons we're looking for various records are numerous and sometimes very personal. We may begin to question if these records ever existed at all. Some may have been lost to time...others destroyed. But there are also genealogical gold mines, archives we simply aren't allowed to access and many of us may not even know they exist. Despite being called public, some are anything but.

Enter Reclaim the Records, a non-profit organization with the mission of making historical and genealogical records accessible to the public. As an advocacy group, they fight for transparency and access to records using Freedom of Information requests, and lawsuits if it becomes necessary. Once "reclaimed", they make the records they obtain freely available to all. 

Their approach is nothing short of inspired legal wrangling. By studying the laws surrounding specific record sets in a given area, they utilize legal maneuvers to demonstrate the public's right to access governmental records. Reclaim the Records has successfully liberated many millions of documents. These range from birth, death, marriage and naturalizations records to other genealogically important archives. They've targeted additional new record sets on their "to-do" list, not only in the categories above, but divorce, educational, probate, military and more.

Recently, in my home state of Maryland, they freed the Maryland Motherlode. This massive record set is estimated at over 5 million records and includes birth, death, marriage and naturalizations. The collection includes indexes as well as images. In this case, they researched the law and were successful with a Freedom of Information request. They did not have to sue the state. If you're interested in viewing the Maryland archives Reclaim the Records has made available for free, they can be viewed here.

The positive impact of Reclaim the Records can be felt by all genealogists and family historians. Even if you've not had a reason to visit the records they've made available, their work underscores the importance of unlocking public records. They continue to remind us these documents belong to the public, not locked away in some vault or storage area. They should be shared, explored and preserved for future generations of researchers. I encourage you to visit Reclaim the Records. Read about their latest successes. Sign up for their newsletter. As a non-profit run by volunteers, donor support helps ensure they can continue to fight for records. If you want to support the cause, you can donate on their site.

As genealogists, the work of Reclaim the Records offers us invaluable resources on our journey piecing together our family histories and stories. For those of us who've faced the frustration of "brick walls" in our research, Reclaim the Records demonstrates how determination can bring about positive and productive change. Their efforts remind us with the right research and approach, the records of the past are often within reach. It's a lesson we can apply to many of our brick walls. With patience, a well designed plan and perseverance...it can sometimes be possible to break down brick walls, bringing records we need into the light. 

Image by Mariann Szőke from Pixabay


26 February 2024

Two Months In: Ancestry Tree Checker Frustrations

 


Ancestry Tree Checker
While I do continue to pay monthly for Ancestry.com's Pro Tools, I have to say, I'm more than a little frustrated and disappointed with the Tree Checker. This is the Pro Tools feature I tend to visit most often and there are several issues I've encountered. While I suppose it's better than nothing, especially for those who aren't meticulous about creating people and facts or those who have never run a consistency checker on their tree before, it has a long ways to go to be a truly useful tool...and I'm beginning to question if Pro Tools is worth keeping.

When first rolled out, I was presented primarily with suggestions of potential duplicate people (who weren't). I took the time to clear them all, marking each as "not a duplicate". This was time consuming, especially since many were unknown children matched to other unknown children AND to other known children. When the list was finally empty, I felt satisfied. A few days later, I'd have a new slew of possible duplicates. Wash, rinse, repeat. This went on for a couple of weeks. It's clear the checker either isn't running through the entire tree when presenting possible issues, or it simply can't keep up with the rejection of duplicates in quick succession and it's presenting the same potential errors over and over. This was quite disappointing,, but I could understand. Since Ancestry has a lot of users and if they had a lot of people subscribing to the new tools at once, perhaps it overtaxed the system. I decided I'd chalk it up to being a new feature.

Finally, I was done with the tedious "not a duplicate task" and looking forward to more relevant results. For the past 2 weeks, Every time I've checked for errors, I've been shown a particular person. When I click to see the errors - there are none. There's a slide out saying "Nice Work! That's all the errors we found." If there are no errors, why is Ancestry still showing me there's a problem for this person? I know it can take a few minutes for the system to refresh depending on how busy the site is, but really? Weeks of showing me the same person with no errors? I'm paying for this? 

Yesterday, in addition to the one person above, there were 2 more people with potential errors. OK, here we go! Maybe something useful? Nope! "Nice work! That's all the errors we found." So then I was up to 3 people who supposedly had errors, but didn't. I have no way to clear them off the screen. I only have 3 filters: Possible duplicates, People without relationships and Other possible issues. Since none of these people are duplicates, none are hanging without relationships and Ancestry can't show me any other possible issues...WHY are they showing in the tree checker? 

I understand Ancestry has a history of rolling out features before they're entirely ready to be rolled out. In a bid to stay relevant, I'm sure this was a strategic move. On the surface, it does make it seem as if they're developing new features (even if they aren't new to those who've been using them on other sites for free for some time). But when it's been a couple of months and the kinks aren't starting to disappear, I have to wonder about the future of Pro Tools. If users are going to pay for additional features, I'm pretty sure most of us want them to work consistently. If you've been using Pro Tools, connect with me on social media. I'd love to hear if you're experiencing the same type of concerns and whether you're planning to keep or scrap Pro Tools.

22 February 2024

Feelings About FamilySearch

Image by stokpic from Pixabay
I haven't written about FamilySearch.org, not because it isn't a good site...it definitely is! The records and resources can be extremely beneficial. In fact, many sites offering hints do so to records found on FamilySearch. My biggest issue is with the shared family tree. It's really hard for me to get excited about a tree anyone can change. Those with established trees and years of research under their belt have undoubtedly used the site at some point. This post is more for those who may be looking for ways to get started with their journey, or for those who haven't visited the site in awhile.

Let's start on the bright side, FamilySearch is totally free. For many, this is understandably a big draw. If you're new to genealogy and want to get your feet wet without the limitation of tons of hints you can't actually view and without a monetary investment, this may well be the best site to start with. They have a huge repository of records! Some are indexed, some aren't (as with many sites). While many of their records are digitized, with more added every week, there are some records only viewable at their family history centers. I've personally never been to one of their centers, as the majority of records I've been interested in I've been able to view online (or there were transcribed results sufficient for my needs). If you live near a FamilySearch center, you can even get one-on-one help by visiting them. For a free site, FamilySearch absolutely has a lot to offer.

They go far beyond just trees, hints and record collections. A tremendous plus is the FamilySearch Research Wiki (no login required) Even if, like me, you don't care for the tree building on the site, the Wiki is truly an amazing resource. You'll find information on records, research and many other valuable resources. Even for seasoned researchers, the Wiki is definitely worth having as a tool in your genealogy toolbox. On their main site (login required) you can also connect with and message other members. I've done this a few times, and people have always been very pleasant and helpful. I also enjoy the Activities section. From time to time, I check out my potential famous relatives (though I have yet to connect any to my tree via my own research). There are also numerous other activities available to encourage both adults and children alike to engage in family history. FamilySearch also hosts and sponsors RootsTech. If you aren't familiar, it's "A family history conference. An on-demand learning library. A way to grow closer to the people, places, and stories that matter most." For the past few years, they've offered the ability to participate in the conference virtually, for free. If you've not signed up for RootsTech this year, I encourage you to do so here

And now for the downside. For me, this is a hurdle I can't get past. Unlike the big subscription sites (ex: Ancestry, MyHeritage, FindMyPast) where you control your tree and who has access to see and edit it, on FamilySearch your tree really isn't "yours". While you'll see your ancestors when you login, the entries are actually part of a larger shared family tree. Some call this type of tree a "one world tree". The data you add to your tree can be viewed and edited by others. The only privacy is for living people. You could shut down your computer one night, happy with your progress and research, only to log in tomorrow to find a bunch of changes you didn't make. It's simply how the system works. In theory, if everyone was detailed and citied everything it would be great. But it isn't reality. I've read countless posts by folks who simply get tired of trying to fix mistakes perpetuated by others. There is no "double check" to be sure others enter correct information. This often leads to duplicate people, incorrect family members, and facts without any citations. The accuracy of the tree is sometimes questionable. I absolutely do refer to my FamilySearch tree at times, but it's fairly infrequent. 

As a resource for records, research guidance and learning opportunities, the site is truly fantastic! The activities can be very engaging and certainly a great springboard for younger generations to learn about their ancestors. Being free is a huge bonus! There are very real costs associated with making so many records available. Whether you're accessing these records via hints on other sites, or directly on FamilySearch, we're all very lucky to have such a diverse collection of records made available to us. My only gripe is the shared tree and I really don't expect it to change. Doing so now would be a monumental undertaking. It's simply a limitation to be aware of, and to keep in mind when you're working on the site. If you're new to genealogy and haven't visited FamilySearch.org, I absolutely encourage you to check it out. Whether you decide to keep a tree there, or not, is a personal choice. The shared tree doesn't diminish the overall value of the site.

Image by stokpic from Pixabay

20 February 2024

Double Vision: RootsFinder and American AncesTREES

Image by PayPal.me/FelixMittermeier from Pixabay
By now you probably know I have a bit of a subscription addiction. This weekend, I was really tempted to subscribe to RootsFinder. I've had the free plan for some time, but never really took it for much of a spin. The site is owned by FindMyPast, a bit odd considering they have their own GEDCOM import and tree building capabilities on their site (and I'm already using them). But still, on the surface, at only $34.95 per year for the Pro Plan, it seemed like a well priced addition...and there were a few features I thought I liked the sound of.

After comparing the free vs. paid Pro Plan, it seemed like the biggest differences were the ability to set trees as private and the DNA tools. To be clear, it's tools....not additional DNA matches. I have plenty of other sites with DNA tools I'm not fully utilizing, so it wasn't much of a stretch (this time) to kick the tires on the free version before upgrading.

RootsFinder
One of the draws for me was aggregating hints from multiple sites together in one location. While I do most of my research on Ancestry, I do like to pop over to other sites to see additional hints from time to time, especially about direct ancestors. Who doesn't want to move another generation back?! Per their site, RootFinder pulls hints from "FamilySearch, BillionGraves, FindAGrave, OpenArch, GenealogieOnline, and paid subscription sites Findmypast, AmericanAncestors, RootsPoint, Ancestry and MyHeritage." Subscriptions are required to actually view the hints from the paid sites.

After uploading my GEDCOM, I immediately noticed the tree building and hinting system looked identical to American AncesTREES from American Ancestors. For a moment there I thought I was seeing double! The selections for hinting are the same: Direct Ancestors, End of Line (people with no parents) and Everyone (though a pop up warns hinting is limited to 2000 people.) The checkboxes to pull hints from various sites are the same. The one-time sign in to FamilySearch so it can "mirror" your tree is the same and the warning if you delete your tree it will no longer be on FamilySearch or RootsFinder are the same. (Don't worry, if you have a tree on FamilySearch already, it will NOT delete it. It only deletes the "mirror" tree.) Editing a person is the same as well.

With a quick search I found American AncesTREES pulls hints from "American Ancestors, FamilySearch, FindmyPast, Newspaper Archive, Billion Graves, Find a Grave and more." They say search hints are available for Ancestry.com, but offered up as collections to search, not actual hints. Just like RootsFinder, subscriptions are required to actually view the hints from the paid sites. American Ancestors, where I already have a subscription, was $99.95 per year, but comes with a whole host of other third party databases and research tools (a big draw for me).  

For all intents and purposes, these two sites appear to be using the same technology for their tree building interface and hinting. After consideration, I decided not to use RootsFinder after all. Being limited in how many people can receive hints for is a big deal to me. I'm already doing direct ancestors only on American AncesTREES and a duplication of this information isn't helpful. Since I didn't upgrade, I couldn't compare the DNA features, but I'd be surprised if they weren't the same too. Given FindMyPast has it's own tree building capabilities (and they aren't the same as RootsFinder), I wonder if they aren't simply licensing out the RootsFinder technology to any genealogical society who wants to use it on their own sites. (American Ancestors, also known as the New England Historic Genealogical Society, founded back in 1845, is a tremendous resource for those with family heralding from New England.) If FindMyPast was serious about development of RootsFinder (or American AncesTREES...or whatever you want to call it...) they'd have kept the algorithms and interface proprietary. It seems more of an attempt to create a return on their 2019 investment in RootsFinder.

If you're concerned about the cost of genealogy and/or have a smaller tree where the person limit on hints isn't a drawback, you can certainly try the free version at either site. I joined American Ancestors primarily for the collection of third party databases. American AncesTREES was just a bonus extra for me. If you're going to spend money on either site, supporting a genealogical society is probably a better choice. A subscription to AmericanAncestors includes access to all their databases (including third party databases not included in tree hints), discounts on books and courses, free admission to the research center, a 10% discount on GEDmatch Tier 1, and more. Quite honestly, I probably wouldn't select either site as the host for my tree. The user interface at Ancestry is far superior. The only plus to either RootsFinder or American AncesTREES is the multiple hinting, and you can always use this feature (with the free plans) alongside any site or software you may choose as the home for your tree. 

16 February 2024

Exploring the Past with a Glimpse of the Future: DALL-E and Genealogy

Image created with AI DALL-E at ChatGPT

One of the features in the expanding world of AI is DALL-E (available with a ChatGPT Plus subscription of $20 per month). This is the part of AI capable of generating amazing images from words (and sometimes a little imagination). For this post I simply asked DALL-E to create an image for my genealogy blog. The image on the left was generated, and I have to admit, I really like it. AI provided me with this text to go along with the image "Here's the image created for your genealogy blog. It's designed to visually encapsulate the essence of genealogy, highlighting elements...represent[ing] the discovery and curation of family histories. This should serve well for your blog, inviting readers to explore the...content you've selected."

I was a little short on time for my post this evening, so I asked ChatGPT 4 to provide me with a bit more information on using DALL-E for genealogy. While many are jumping on the AI bandwagon, others are understandably leery of this new technology. Other than the final paragraph (and the removal of the word "that" in several places, because my high school writing teacher drilled into my head "whichery, whatery and thatery don't belong in writing, and to this day one of my final proofreads is always for these words) the text below is substantially unaltered and was provided by using the following prompt in ChatGPT 4 (Note: Upon request AI also provided me with the HTML code to create the shaded quote box displaying the text used for the prompt, saving me having to search how to code it manually):

Prompt:    

You are a genealogist learning about artificial intelligence. Provide a short blog post about creating images with DALL-E.

"As genealogists, we often find ourselves sifting through the sands of time, piecing together stories from the fragments left behind by our ancestors. Yet, despite our best efforts, there are moments and faces...remain[ing] shrouded in the mists of history, leaving us to wonder about the world our predecessors lived in. Enter DALL-E, an artificial intelligence marvel...[with] the potential to breathe life into our historical imaginations.

DALL-E, developed by OpenAI, is a cutting-edge AI program capable of generating images from textual descriptions. This tool doesn't just create art; it opens a window into worlds unseen and possibilities unexplored. Imagine being able to visualize a 19th-century marketplace as described in an ancestor's diary or the intricate details of a family heirloom...long since been lost to time. With DALL-E, these figments of our genealogical pursuits can be rendered into vivid images.

The application of DALL-E in genealogy extends beyond mere curiosity or the desire to fill in the visual gaps of our family trees. It represents a fusion of technology and history, allowing us to:

  • Recreate Historical Scenes: By inputting detailed descriptions from historical records, letters, or diaries, genealogists can use DALL-E to generate visual representations of the lives and times of their ancestors, offering a new perspective on the information we've gathered.

  • Visualize Ancestral Artifacts: From descriptions of clothing, jewelry, to household items, DALL-E can help visualize artifacts...once part of our ancestors' daily lives, providing a deeper understanding of their personal and cultural contexts.

  • Enhance Engagement: For those sharing their genealogical findings with family members or the public, images created by DALL-E can make historical narratives more engaging and accessible, bridging the gap between past and present.

While the potential of DALL-E in genealogy is immense, it's crucial to approach its use with a critical eye. The images generated are interpretations, not historical records. They are based on the AI's training and the specificity of the input it receives. Thus, while they can add color to our narratives, they should not be considered factual representations. Furthermore, ethical considerations regarding the depiction of individuals and events must be carefully navigated to ensure...the use of DALL-E respects historical accuracy and sensitivity.

For genealogists, DALL-E offers a fascinating tool to enhance our exploration of the past. It allows us to visualize, engage with, and share our historical research in new and exciting ways. However, it's essential to use this technology as a complement to, not a replacement for, rigorous historical research and analysis. As we continue to integrate AI tools like DALL-E into our genealogical work, the boundary between the past and the present blurs, offering us a unique opportunity to connect with our ancestors' worlds in a manner previously unimaginable."

As you can see, AI did a nice job providing the information I requested and included sound advice on using DALL-E to create images for genealogy. As with any AI output, reviewing it for accuracy is extremely important. In this case, AI seems to have done a fairly nice job. I  believe it's appropriate to note when images and text have been generated using AI, and I will always strive to do so (unless I've substantially changed the text output). For this one post, I used AI to create an image, HTML code and provide relevant text. At this time, AI does not have the "training" or resources necessary to do reliable factual genealogical research and citations. It is not a research shortcut. For now, AI is merely a potentially beneficial tool in the genealogist's toolbox. Once you understand the limitations and strengths you can put it to work for you (should you choose to do so).

Image created with AI DALL-E at ChatGPT

13 February 2024

Suicide or Murder? The Death of Michael Shelly

Michael Shelly
Some might say my father's maternal line carried with it a brief family curse. I'll start at the beginning, with Michael Shelly. Though bad luck befell more than one of his sons as well. 

Michael Shelly was born on March 7, 1811, in Cumberland, Pennsylvania. According to family history, his father, Jacob, was of German descent and possibly born in the Netherlands. The 1850 census shows Jacob's birthplace as Pennsylvania and I've not yet found records to substantiate his birth overseas. For now, we'll just go with the family history. It is known the Shelly's settled and lived on a small island in the Susquehanna River in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania - called Shelly Island. It is believed this is where Michael was born. 

His family moved to Wayne, Ohio, around 1828, where he would lay down roots and build a legacy. On February 19, 1835, Michael married Elizabeth Houser on his father's farm. Together, they prospered, purchasing and working a 160-acre farm in Plain, Wayne, Ohio. Over time, he purchased additional farms, growing his portfolio to a whopping 800 acres! Michael was a talented farmer, his land and assets reflecting his hard work. By 1860, his property alone was valued at over $29,000 (over $1 million dollars in today's money).

Michael and Elizabeth had a large family, 6 boys and 4 girls: Christian, Michael H. Jr., Jacob, Peter, Joseph C., Eliza A., Sarah, John William, Mary Ann, and Susan. Michael Sr. was a devout Lutheran and took an active interest in township affairs, aligning with the Republican party. 

Tragedy struck in his later years. Following is a melding of remembrances of Henry Shelly, the grandson of Michael and half-brother of Alva (who witnessed the events), newspaper articles published at the time and accounts written by family. This story of greed, robbery and death was well covered and much discussed. 

In 1890, banks were having a tough go of it, and people were losing their savings. Despite his niece's husband owning a bank, Michael didn't trust trust them, and kept his money in a dresser at his home. This decision would prove pivotal. On August 20, 1890, after returning from taking cattle to market, Michael was the victim of a brutal robbery in his home. He was 79 and his wife 76 years old. Their 10 year old grandson, Alva, Shelly lived with them. Shortly after midnight, masked men (some accounts say 4 others say 9) entered the house, battering the door to break in. They threatened the Shelly's with a revolver and bound both Michael and Alva. Michael refused to unlock the dresser for them, so they used chisels to open it. Ultimately, they reportedly stole over $6000 in cash (worth over $200,000 today). Then or now, it was a lot of money! Michael would never speak of the exact amount taken. Sadly, Elizabeth, already in poor health, was terribly affected by the whole event and she died just a few short months later in November 1890.

This crime set a series of events into motion culminating in a second loss of life. Michael recognized the voices of some of the men as those of his neighbors. At first, he didn't want to name them (he testified in the preliminary hearing) because he was afraid they'd retaliate and burn his buildings down. There had been other robberies in the community and since he thought he could name most of the men, he ultimately filed charges against Dan Binkley (an ex-policeman in Kansas City), Dick Lee, Dick Geiselman and others. Newspapers also listed Henry Binkley (father of Dan) and Henry Webb as suspects. Lee and Geiselman were supposedly sent to jail. The Binkley's and Webb were put on trial.

On the first day of the hearings May 12,1891, Michael was relentlessly questioned on the witness stand for over six hours. He bravely testified against his neighbors. There was damning testimony from others. Some of the money had likely been used to make mortgage payments by two of the accused in November 1890. Another person testified he sold acreage to Dan Binkley, presumably paid for with the ill gotten gains. Michael's testimony didn't end until 4:30pm on the first day of the trial.

News articles indicated he was affected by the grueling defense examination. At his age, I would expect he'd have been both physically and mentally exhausted. In the evening, he told his housekeeper he wanted breakfast the following morning before leaving for the trial. On May 13, 1891, his grandson Alva didn't see him in the house at breakfast but noticed the barn door was open. He reminded the housekeeper to make the meal and went off to find his grandfather. To his horror, he discovered the body of Michael Shelly, partially under a wagon, dead at 80 years old in his own barn with a single bullet hole in his head. A revolver lay on the ground nearby. 

The circumstances surrounding his death were murky, with widespread speculation about whether it was a result of murder or suicide. It is well documented Michael suffered immense stress after the robbery and during the trial. Reports suggested the strain may have driven him to suicide. A revolver with one empty chamber was found lying at his feet, further complicating the narrative of his death. Neighbors who arrived at the barn did not believe he could have killed himself based on the scene they viewed. The police, however, concluded it was a suicide. Unfortunately, there was no fingerprint evidence available to the police during their investigation. Fingerprinting of suspects wasn't used in the United States until 1903. The family believed Michael had gone to do the morning feeding of the livestock and was shot in the head by someone involved in, or associated with, the robbery. The Wayne County Democrat (May 27, 1891) reported the charges against all the remaining defendants were dropped.

Questions remain (at least for me). How did the gun end up at his feet when he was shot in the head? Why was he partially under the wagon? Although the day on the stand was difficult, wasn't the worst of it over? Why kill himself after he had already testified? Why ask for breakfast if he was so despondent he was considering killing himself? It is told, on the very same day his body was discovered, one of the accused Binkley's packed up his family and moved to Alberta, Canada. If true, why flee when robbery charges had been dropped? Was there fear murder charges might follow? How much was really stolen? At one time, an attorney told the family the men claimed to have stolen $35,000 ($1.1 million today). I thought such an amount would be awfully heavy, but Henry Shelly recalled, based on Alva having been a witness to the events, the robbers took a $1000 bill (yes, it was real, but they stopped printing them in 1969) and taunted Michael by waving it in his face. $35,000 wouldn't be very heavy if much of it was in $500 or $1000 dollar bills. And most of all, I wonder if the men at the center of it all felt any remorse or regret? What did they tell their families? Does someone out there know missing pieces of this story?

The funeral sermon for Michael Shelly was delivered by Rev. J.B. Bergner. I'm lucky enough to have a three page transcription of the actual sermon, including the thoughts Rev. Bergner shared as to why the death occurred. He lay the blame squarely on the robbers who set in motion a chain of events culminating in death...though he stopped short of saying it was either murder or suicide. Michael was laid to rest in the Plain Lutheran Cemetery with his headstone reflecting his life span: 80 years, 2 months, and 6 days. His life, marked by his successes as a farmer and the tragic end that befell him, has been a poignant story in the history of Wayne County.

The dresser still remains in the family. The chisel marks made by the robbers can still be seen. The family continued as well know farmers in the area, though their trajectory was undoubtedly inextricably altered. Some of his children did well, others suffered their own tragedies. In an ironic twist of fate, the barn Michael built, and died in, burned down. In 1957, the house he built on the property also burned. 

Michael Shelly picture from the Commemorative Biographical Record Wayne County, Ohio 1889
Photo of dresser publicly shared by DonnaScott79 on Ancestry.com

10 February 2024

Don't Waste Your Money on this AI for Family History Course

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay
In general, I've been a big fan of the Family History Daily courses. They're designed for the casual or amateur genealogist and usually offer lots of practical and useful information. I purchased the Complete Access package a few years ago when I was restarting my tree. This package grants me free access to any new courses as they're added. I was really excited to see they added an "AI for Family History" course recently, and a few nights ago I settled in to work thru it. 

I'll start on a positive note. If you have no familiarity with AI and using these new tools, the information is presented simply and in a way most people can probably understand. Several AI tools are compared, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each. By using the same set of prompts for each tool, they clearly illustrate (with plenty of images) where different tools do well, and where they run into challenges. The course covers a basic introduction to AI, privacy and security concerns, tasks AI can and cannot do, and a presentation on creating simplistic prompts. It also illustrates how refining prompts assists in better responses. After showing examples from the various AI tools, they round it out with a few genealogy tasks AI is currently reasonably well suited for such as transcribing, translating, visualizing data and a couple others.

Now for the huge negative - the price. The course is regularly priced at $129, but could be less if they're running a special. I would NOT pay for this course under any circumstances! Certainly not at $129...and not at any reduced price either. It only took me a little over an hour to work thru the whole course (admittedly, this did not include any time spent practicing, as I already have a basic familiarity with AI). If you happen to have a Complete Access package (allowing free access to new course materials), it may be worth an hour or so if you haven't spent any time at all trying out AI. But, most of the information provided can be easily gleaned from reading posts written by those currently using AI as a genealogy tool. The comparison of various AI sites really didn't add much substance, though I did learn the names of a few tools I'll probably never bother to access. This is truly a bare bones introduction If you have any hands on time at all with AI, you're unlikely to gain much in the way of new insights.

Are you interested in an introductions to this new technology but don't know where to begin? I can definitely point you toward some free options to get you started! I recently came across AI Genealogy Insights. This is a blog dedicated to exploring AI as it relates to use in genealogy. While written at a slightly higher level than absolute beginner, it's more in depth and gives better insights into using AI alongside your traditional research. Best of all, it's completely FREE! There's an entire section dedicated to Use Cases where clear information is presented on creating and using extremely well structured prompts to achieve usable results. The prompts illustrated in this blog are head and shoulders above what's presented in the Family History Daily course. I'd urge you to spend an hour reading this blog over spending even a dime for the course. ChatGPT also offers the OpenAI Help Center. Here you have access to considerable information about this popular tool and how to best use it.

As you probably know from my other posts, I'm not at all opposed to paying for subscriptions, courses, or anything else to help further my knowledge and research. Some materials and tools are absolutely worth the investment (both time and money). This course is not one of them. You'd be far better off spending $20 a month for ChatGPT Plus for 6 months than paying for this course. AI is simply a tool. I don't mean to burst the bubble, but it's not going to replace traditional research any time soon. It can definitely assist with many mundane tasks such as transcribing and translating (though you still need to double check what it provides as it does make errors and sometimes fabricates information.) At this point in time, my personal suggestion if you're interested in using this technology is to read some of the posts on AI Genealogy Insights and go hands on with ChatGPT. You'll be surprised how quickly you can learn to use this new tech to help you in your genealogy journey.

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

08 February 2024

Palaeography: Deciphering Old Handwriting

Image by Petra from Pixabay
palaeography: The study of ancient writing and inscriptions; the science or art of deciphering and determining the date of ancient writings or systems of writing.

Deciphering old handwriting can be really challenging! I'm getting better (albeit slowly), but some of the mid-18th century and earlier really stumps me at times. Practice is definitely key. I've dabbled with using ChatGPT to transcribe portions of old documents...with mixed success. Sometimes it gives me a relatively good transcription and I'm like "Oh! That's what it says". Other times, it simply informs me old handwriting can be hard to read and I might need to investigate further and use other documents to compare writing samples. 

Recently, I saw a post where someone shared a cheat sheet of sorts. I've been using it the last week or so, and it's been helpful. It's been posted on multiple sites (with no original source noted). If you haven't seen it and would like to save a copy, just click the image and save it to your computer.

I've also come across couple of free online courses/tutorials. I'm planning to work through these courses in the coming months as a part of my "continuing genealogy education". I'm starting to get back to the late 1700's and early 1800's on my paternal line, and it's becoming very apparent I need to improve my skills in this area. 

The National Archives (UK) offers Palaeography: reading old handriting 1500-1800 A practical online tutorial with 10 lessons and tips for further practice.

CERES COPIA (University of Cambridge, England) has a course comprised of 28 lessons: English Handwriting 1500-1700: An Online Course.

If you're researching other countries and languages the challenge can be even greater. Not only do you need to know styles of writing, but the language at the time. I'd encourage  you to search out some resources before you jump in. The FamilySearch Wiki currently has over 9600 entries on handwriting, covering lots of countries. It also includes word lists you may require in your endeavors. Simply use the search box to narrow the results for the country or language you need. Thus far, I've been lucky enough not to encounter other languages, but given a portion of my paternal line is German, I don't think I'm going to dodge it forever. My DNA shows some other European countries and if I'm lucky enough to find where the ancestors I carry with me came from, I definitely want to be prepared.

While brushing up on skills is important, it's unlikely to solve all the challenges of reading old handwriting. The writer may have been in a hurry, ink may be faded and let's face it...some people just have chicken scratch! Only with time and practice will deciphering old writing become easier. AI may one day be sophisticated enough to transcribe consistently, but it's still no substitute for learning how to read documents yourself. Even if you are successful with an AI transcription, you still need to compare the AI result with the original and verify it's correct. As you continue your journey back in time, take time to learn to read old script (no matter what language it may be).

 (Links to referenced resources have been added to my Genealogy Toolbox page for easy reference.) 

Image by Petra from Pixabay

05 February 2024

Privatizing GEDCOMs: When and Why It Matters

Image by Tumisu from Pixabay
For those interested in uploading their GEDCOM to other sites to gain hints, new DNA matches or simply to enhance your research, making sure living people are privatized and/or protected is extremely important. Different sites have different policies and requirements. While most sites have a policy in place to try to protect the identity of living individuals, it's important to know, before you upload exactly what you're sharing. I'm going to take a look at some of the most common places users upload GEDCOMs and the default privacy practices, for living people, of each site.

As anyone who's done genealogy for any period of time knows, it doesn't take a lot of information for someone to be able to track down additional data on living people. It's fine if you're tracking it down for your own private use (let's be honest, figuring out those DNA match connections is exciting, even if it does feel a little stalky!) Most records on living people come from publicly accessible records or databases (meaning, anyone who really wants to find the information probably can). But it's still important to make sure you aren't sharing information about someone who may not want the information shared (especially minors, where you may have personal or family knowledge about key information such as full names and birthdates not yet available from other sources.)

Below are the policies from some of the most popular websites:

SITE POLICY
Ancestry People marked as “living” are fully visible only to the tree owner, unless the owner shares their tree with others and authorizes them to see living people (or gives them the role “editor”). To everyone else on Ancestry, living people show as “Private.” People under 100 years old are considered to be living if no death information is provided. If your tree is public, the only way to make someone private without making the whole tree private is to label them "living."
MyHeritage Family sites at MyHeritage.com are automatically protected with privacy settings that prevent guests (non-members) from viewing sensitive information about living family members in family trees, such as first names and email addresses. They [guests] will be able to see the content that you and your site members have posted, except that your family tree will be censored (limited) so that information on living people will be hidden away. Hidden means that other than last names, no information of living people in family trees will be displayed: first names, genders, photos, dates, events, etc -- all will be hidden.
FindMyPast Any living relatives will be marked 'private' and no details will be shown. No other user will be able to edit or change your tree in any way. Photographs and media will ONLY be shared if the additional 'Share photographs for Deceased ancestors' permission is switched on.
FamilySearch

Family Tree protects the privacy of living people by restricting who can see their records. You can see the record of a living person only if you created the record. The system hides records that you create of living people from everyone else, including the people themselves and other family members. 
American Ancestors Information about living people is always private no matter which plan you choose
Geneanet Information about living people defined as having been alive within the past 100 years (contemporaries) are masked with the “Private” setting by default, with no information shown; you are asked to confirm this choice when you create your tree at Geneanet, or to choose one of the alternative privacy settings.
rootsfinder Living people's data is never visible to anyone but the registered owner of the tree and those invited by that user.
GEDmatch You agree to privatize living individuals (other than yourself) in your Genealogy Data prior to providing their Genealogy Data to GEDmatch. In order to privatize living individuals in your Genealogy Data, you must privatize Genealogy Data that contains living individuals before uploading to GEDmatch by changing the name(s) of living individual(s) to 'LIVING'... Upon an upload of a GEDcom to GEDmatch we will automatically review and change the privacy setting for the Genealogy Data of individuals in your GEDcom to “HIDDEN” if we believe such individuals are alive based on birth or death dates. The owner of a GEDcom will see the Genealogy Data of all individuals in their GEDcom that are both alive and deceased; other users will only see the Genealogy Data of deceased individuals.
FTDNA     Please note that when you select to share your family tree, living people born less than 100 years ago will not be displayed. You, deceased individuals, and individuals born more than 100 years ago will be displayed. 
DNA Painter The default option is to hide living people, replacing them with 'Living', so their details are never uploaded at all. You can optionally override this.

As you can see, most sites try to protect the privacy of living people by default, but some allow the option to override this protection based on you (the user) granting specific permissions to other users. GEDmatch has the more stringent restriction of requiring confirmation of privatization prior to upload, even though it appears they will still try to hide individuals if this hasn't been done. If you're using another site, check their policy before you upload just to be safe. And, since policies can change, reviewing periodically isn't a bad idea.

If you are an Ancestry user, please know the GEDCOM you export from Ancestry does not privatize by default. To privatize, you would need to either open the file in a text editor (such as Notepad) and edit manually or use desktop software, such as Family Tree Maker or RootsMagic, to do this for you. Depending on the size of your GEDCOM, manual editing may be less than ideal. If you use Family Tree Maker or RootsMagic, and you also privatize any facts, notes, weblinks or media, be sure you include similar privatization for these items when you export as well. You don't want to accidentally upload something to a website you never intended to become public. As we know from recent DNA breaches, anything on the web has the potential to end up in the hands of hackers. It's also wise to remember, once you post something, it's likely out there forever...even if you later delete it. Never ever upload any sensitive information or anything you, or your family members, might be horrified if it became public...especially important if the information isn't available publicly or in searchable databases (paid or free) or pertains to a minor.

While my trees are generally public (and I do have GEDCOMs uploaded to several sites), I only have 2 individuals I've allowed to see living people - and only on Ancestry where my main working tree is located. I'd suggest if you're going to allow exceptions, make it only on the site where you have your main tree. You don't want to have to remember all the various sites you may have granted different permissions if for some reason you decide to revoke access to any, or all, other users you've allowed to see living people. Privacy is a big concern, and a very legitimate one. With forethought, it doesn't have to hold you back from privatizing and reaping the benefits of more hints, more DNA matches, and the potential to break through brick walls.

Image by Tumisu from Pixabay

03 February 2024

Cost Savings Tip: Accessible Archives and the Conococheague Institue

Image by Michal Jarmoluk from Pixabay
Accessible Archives was founded in 1990. They've assembled a database comprised of "Diverse primary source materials reflecting broad views across American history and culture". Most of the publications are from the 18th and 19th century. This data has all been scanned and digitized, and all text is searchable. Though the site is in the midst of a transition after becoming a part of Coherent Digital in 2023, it's still fully functional and a great source of information. The information on the site will be transferred to History Commons and ultimately, it will be even more useful as it's integrated into the new platform. 

I found the site particularly helpful for accessing some specific Pennsylvania newspapers not available elsewhere. These are but a few of the many collections available (see the link below for a more comprehensive list):

  • African American Newspapers
  • America and World War I: American Military Camp Newspapers
  • American County Histories
  • Native Americans in History
  • The Civil War Collection
  • The Pennsylvania Gazette
  • The Pennsylvania Genealogical Catalogue
  • The Pennsylvania Newspaper Record
  • Reconstruction of Southern States
  • South Carolina Newspapers
  • The Virginia Gazette

The individual membership (prior to the acquisition) was around $99 per year. Since I already had a lot of subscriptions, I wasn't sure I wanted to spend the additional money. So I searched for discounts. I found a way to support the Conococheague Institute, a regional learning center with the mission to "to develop and foster awareness, understanding, and stewardship of the cultural and natural history of the Appalachian frontier of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia" AND gain access to Accessible Archives! 

By joining the Conococheague Institute, you cannot only access all the collections at Accessible Archives, you also receive a membership card for free admission to events (with the exception of some of their fundraisers). On the 30 acre grounds of the homestead and gardens, they have buildings, re-enactments, archives, artifacts and a library. For those who cannot visit in person they even offer some virtual programs. The Institute offers learning opportunities for families and history buffs alike! The price for an individual membership is just $25 per year! There are other membership levels available, including student and family, as well as some higher levels. Each level has its own membership benefits. If you'd like to consider joining to take advantage of this great opportunity, view the membership options here

This cost saving tip is a win-win. Not only do you get access to a great wealth of searchable data (no matter where you live) but membership supports a worthy cause. Just in case you're wondering how to pronounce the name of the Institute, per the website: "In the Lenape language it is translated as 'Water of many turns' and it is phonetically pronounced as 'KAH-no-KAH-cheek'. Today locals pronounce it as 'Conica-jig'." I you live within driving distance, with so many learning programs, this would make for great family day trips!

Image by Michal Jarmoluk from Pixabay

02 February 2024

Frederick Douglas James Fought for Freedom

 

Frederick Douglas James
Frederick Douglas James was my 1st cousin 3x removed on my paternal line. He was born about 1837 in Wooster, Wayne, Ohio to James Charles James (yeah, I know, a bit of an odd naming convention there) and Amelia James. James and Amelia were cousins who came to Ohio from England, making Frederick a first generation American. Amelia arrived in 1832. I don't yet know when James arrived, but they were married in Ohio in 1835. Frederick was the eldest of 12 children (though 4 are still unidentified and presumed to have died young).

His father, James, was a painter in Wooster, Wayne, Ohio, and then a music dealer selling instruments in a variety/general store he owned in Aurora, Kane, Illinois. In the 1860 Census, Frederick's occupation was listed as "dig artist". Based on another person in my tree who had the same occupation in the same census, it appears to have pertained to those who worked in the growing field of photography. He seemed to be following in the creative footsteps of his father.

On July 25, 1861, Frederick felt the call to fight for his country and volunteered to serve in the Union Army. This was well before the draft of 1863. From all appearances, he truly felt drawn to fight for his country. He took his service seriously and served until December 30,1865, rising through the ranks. Based on his enlistment dates, he served for virtually the entire Civil War. 

When he enlisted in Company A of the Ohio 30th Infantry, he was a Private. On August 14, 1861, just a short time after joining, he was promoted to Full Sergeant. He was then promoted to Full Captain and served from September 2, 1863 to December 30,1865 in Company D of the US Colored Troops, 52nd Infantry Regiment, prior to his ultimate resignation. 

The 52nd United States Colored Troop (USCT) were enlisted black soldiers, lead by white officers, and were posted for garrison duty at Vicksburg, Mississippi until June 1865. They saw combat at Coleman's Plantation, Port Gibson on July 4, 1864. They also participated in the Skirmish at Bayou Liddell on October 15, 1864. The USCT showed just how capable they were in battle. They fought hard for freedom and citizenship. For a more detailed account of the history and contributions of the USCT, read To Die By The Flag Rather Than Disgrace It: Black Mississippians in the Union Army.

While originally researching Frederick, I was lucky enough to stumble upon a site selling an album of photos and tintypes from the 52nd US Colored Troop, including 26 portraits of the officers. The officer's names were all included, and I was amazed to find Frederick's portrait, shown above, included. (Just a reminder: While the link I've included does still work, always save an image when you come across a great find like this in your sleuthing! The internet is ever changing and there is no guarantee you'll be able to reach a specific site again in the future.) Sadly, the album does not include any photos of the troops who fought so valiantly, only the officers. 

The online images of Frederick's military service record are faded and difficult to read. There are a number of letters and handwritten documents. I did drop an image in ChatGPT to transcribe one of the documents, and while it wasn't able to transcribe it entirely, it gave me enough information to work with as I looked at the remainder of his file. He was charged with several counts of conduct unbecoming an officer toward the end of his military career and he was facing a court martial. I was unable to discern exactly what he had done, other than seemingly giving two different accounts of something. I presume it must have been an important something to have charges filed. I did notice he was also listed as absent without leave on at least one muster (something he disputed in his resignation). He was found not guilty on all but one of the charges and was reinstated under his Commanding Officer. 

Subsequently, due to his failing health (backed up by a "surgeries certificate" stating he was suffering from severe gastrointestinal issues and was not fit to return to duty) he tendered his resignation. I can't help but notice Frederick looks very gaunt in his portrait. It may well have been taken near the end of his service. He called out in his resignation he had never been absent without approval (and his records do show he was granted more than one leave of absence to return to Ohio for short periods of time). By this time, the war was over and his health was suffering. He asked for and received an honorable discharge to go home and attend to his personal business.

Upon his return home, he married in 1871, at the age of 34, but I've found no records showing he had any children. In the 1880 Census in Aurora, Kane, Illinois, he was listed as a photographer. He seemingly returned home and settled back into the creative pursuits he enjoyed before the war. Frederick Douglas James died February 10, 1882 in Aurora, Kane, Illinois from paralysis of the stomach. His obituary, dated February 12, 1882 in the Chicago Tribune read in part "...served four years in the army, and was promoted because of peculiar courage in the battle of Vicksburg." 

Frederick not only fought for, but alongside those seeking freedom. While he seemed to have had a few issues at the end of his career, it doesn't diminish his overall service to his country. A whisper from the past, his own words immortalized in his service record sum it up the best. "I left everything took arm in defense of my country to help crush the rebellion."