How to Analyze GEDCOM Files Efficiently with GEDminer

I've been looking forward to trying GEDminer, a GEDCOM analyzer. I'm going to resist the temptation to compare it to other consistency checkers I've used, because this one is exceptional and outshines any other I've tried. On the features page you'll find the brief description of:

"Upload a GEDCOM file and instantly access 12+ genealogy analysis tools — demographics, migration maps, error detection, census gaps, kinship calculation, and more."

I gotta tell you, when they say "and more" they mean it! I'm not going to list every feature (the list is simply too long) but even if you don't try it, it's worth heading over to the features page to see the potential it might offer, if and when you need it. Given this is a totally FREE site, and your data is parsed in your browser so it never leaves your computer, you can feel confident when using this tool.

While the site is totally FREE, you can register for an account if you wish. You can also support the site with a donation if you feel inclined to do so. With an account, you can save up to 3 trees. The data saved is parsed and only includes names, dates, places, and relationships. One feature I don't often see, but they offer, is the option to replace a file with a newer version - a feature I've longed for on sites like MyHeritage. If you don't sign up for an account, nothing is saved at all. 

On the Overview page, you'll find some stats as well as an "on this day" feature outlining births, deaths, and marriages on given dates. My sourcing and citations were 98-99%, but my completeness score is 73% - giving me an overall score of 88.79%. Given I know I'm missing some crucial dates, this was expected. To give you an idea of the user interface, here's a screenshot of my overview:

Clicking on any of the issues listed provides more explanation and detail. There's even a section for "quick wins" (sortable by impact or effort required) to help quickly improve your scores. Each page appears to have numerous filter and sort options.

The other main pages are:

• Directory (People, Occupations, Locations and Kinship)
• Integrity (Suggestions, Errors, Vital Sharpener, and Tree Structure)
• Discovery (Migration Analysis, Census Toolbox, Gap Detector, Incomplete Families, DNA Planner and Plan Generator)

I do want to take a moment to call out the Census Toolbox. A quick look at mine shows I moved on from the 1850 to the 1860 census, and I've done a fairly good job with it. But many other census years are really lacking in my research (just as I alluded to in a recent post). 

It goes a step further and suggests all the potential missing censuses, not just from the US, but other countries as well. (Clearly, I have a lot of work to do!!)

If you're still not sure about trying it, head on over to Fortify Your Family Tree - This Free, Elegant GEDCOM Analyzer Is a Wonder for a more in depth review. 

I've barely scratched the surface on this wonderful resource. You truly have to see this in action to appreciate all the features. Each page is filled with useful insights to help you uncover patterns, find potential errors and identify where more research is needed. I find the clear graphics and color coding very satisfying. The data is presented in clear, easy to understand format. This site is also linked in my Genealogy Toolbox under GEDCOMs. 

If you aren't already using this site, give it a try and let me know your thoughts! 

Image by Clker-Free-Vector-Images from Pixabay

3,129 Relatives Later…I’m Still Just Getting Started

I took a moment this weekend to reflect on my tree as it currently stands. I pondered the growth of a genealogical tree compared to real life trees. Plantd has a wonderful (quick to read and easy to understand) post on the life-cycle of real trees (not to say our genealogical trees aren't real - they very much are!) We all start our tree as a seedling. It sprouts and then goes through a period of rapid growth. Our trees may quickly develop into a sapling (young adult trees). They grow taller and stronger, supporting a growing canopy of branches and leaves. The roots grow deeper to support the tree as it inevitably grows in size. 

Over decades, our trees continue to grow stronger and larger. Eventually, they become mature trees. At this point, with a solid trunk, many branches and good set of roots - vertical growth may slow and branches and leaves tend to fill out in areas where they already exist. There is still growth, it just seems to happen more slowly. At this stage the tree becomes an integral part of the ecosystem (in our case, perhaps the basis to help other researchers). Luckily, unlike many real trees, our trees don't have to fall or decay to become the basis for new growth. We can continue to grow our trees for....well...forever if we choose! 

Indeed, even in nature, there are trees living incredible life spans. The giant redwoods (sequoias) are thought to be able to live an astonishing 3.500 years! And while written texts go back as far as 5,500 years, none of us are likely to find written traces of our ancestors anywhere near so old. The oldest traceable family tree is of the Lurie family, dating back to 1037 BC (a stunning 3,063 years!) In more recent discoveries, DNA has unlocked more information on human history. Human DNA 45,000 years old has been found in Germany. And, DNA from Neanderthals has been dated to over 430,000 years ago! Thus far, my family seems very ordinary. As we stretch back in time, ordinary becomes less and less documented, and harder and harder to find. The oldest person in my tree is my 6th great-grandfather, John Martinus Homsher (1689-1747). 337 ago years seems like forever, but it's just s drop in the bucket.

I've intentionally grown my tree slowly. Despite being in my second decade of research, my tree is still young. This is in large part because, like many new family historians, I made mistakes...and LOTS of them! I started and scrapped multiple trees before I found my footing and felt confident in my research. My most recent tree (the one I swore to myself I would "do the right way this time" and never have to start over) was created in early 2021. So it's really only 5 years old. As of this post, I have 3129 people in my tree. Of those, only 38 need some form of documentation. Because I don't place a huge emphases on DNA matches, I've only placed 53 of them thus far (combined from both my and my ex-husband's plethora of DNA matches). I tend to prefer to find where they fit organically (when possible), rather than spending hours trying to dissect and document just to add one DNA match. Eventually, if I keep at it, many will find their way to their proper leaf.

Since my original purpose was to leave a more solid family history for my son than I had, I occasionally look at my tree from the perspective of him as the home person. I've located all his direct ancestors up to and including all of his 3rd great grandparents (both maternal and paternal.) And, out of 64 of his 4th great grandparents, I'm only missing 17. I must admit, he's not nearly as interested in genealogy as I am. He does occasionally enjoy hearing an interesting tidbit or two, but he doesn't share my passion for research. No matter, because I'll continue my search for decades to come! I don't think I'll ever tire of finding new discoveries...or having 20 browser tabs open in the relentless pursuit of one ancestor...or the satisfied feeling of finding where one more DNA relative fits in my tree. 

Image by Dee Guss from Pixabay

Two Free Sources For Locating Digitized Newspapers Online

Recently, Thomas MacEntee wrote about Newspaper Finder in his post Newspaper Finder: The Free Tool Every Genealogist Needs to Find Historical Newspaper Archives Online. The site has the potential to be very useful. But it's new. And new generally comes with some growing pains. I'll most certainly be keeping an eye to see how it expands and develops. They currently include 32 databases (all the major subscription sites like Newspapers, OldNews, NewspaperArchive, Genealogybank, and more). I have no doubt they'll be expanding their offering as time goes on. The site is entirely free to search. If you'd like to read another great user review of the site, head on over to Marian B Wood's post Checking Out Newspaper Finder on Climbing My Family Tree. 

The one issue I had was the search results. Upon clicking on a pin on the map, they show as a list of the newspaper names, years included, and the website where the repository is located. It would be most intuitive to click the website (but those aren't hyperlinked). It took me a moment to realize you have to click on the publication name instead. Those are hyperlinked, but they don't really stand out. Once you click the publication name, you are taken to the site so you can do a more detailed search.

However, the location I needed in my research tonight wasn't coming up. To be fair, it only means this new site doesn't have a database where the particular location and potential titles I wanted are included. And to be extra fair, no one site is ever going to have 100% of anything. It's not really a limitation of the site....just a limitation based on the specific area I needed to search. So I did some more Googling and discovered another fantastic resource.

Talk about not being intuitive...the site is the Montana State University Billings (MSUB) library site. I know right?! How can a Montana college website be a great newspaper reference?! Well, under their History resources, they offer Historical U.S. Newspapers Online. The Home page for this section includes not only the option to search by state, but a section on other pages linking to websites with newspapers from many states. While some of these additional resources appear to be a little more specialized, it's still good information. Clicking on a letter in the menu bar takes you to the states, and each state shows an alphabetized list of newspapers with years. Clicking the link takes you directly to the site where you can do further searches. This site is also free to use.

I'm sure there's overlap between the 2 sites. But there are also differences. On the MSUB site, I was able to find a publication more suited to the data I was looking for...but sadly the years did not encompass the ones I need. But whenever I discover new tools (especially free ones) the time spent is never wasted. Both of these sites will be a great addition to your toolbox, and speaking of toolboxes, I've added both to my Genealogy Toolbox under Indexes/Databases/Newspapers. 

Note: While both sites are totally free to search, some results are to subscription sites where you would need a membership to do further research.