Honoring those memorialized in family trees everywhere...and the ones yet to be discovered. Sharing inspiration, information & opinions for the journey finding family.
I took a moment this weekend to reflect on my tree as it currently stands. I pondered the growth of a genealogical tree compared to real life trees. Plantd has a wonderful (quick to read and easy to understand) post on the life-cycle of real trees (not to say our genealogical trees aren't real - they very much are!) We all start our tree as a seedling. It sprouts and then goes through a period of rapid growth. Our trees may quickly develop into a sapling (young adult trees). They grow taller and stronger, supporting a growing canopy of branches and leaves. The roots grow deeper to support the tree as it inevitably grows in size.
Over decades, our trees continue to grow stronger and larger. Eventually, they become mature trees. At this point, with a solid trunk, many branches and good set of roots - vertical growth may slow and branches and leaves tend to fill out in areas where they already exist. There is still growth, it just seems to happen more slowly. At this stage the tree becomes an integral part of the ecosystem (in our case, perhaps the basis to help other researchers). Luckily, unlike many real trees, our trees don't have to fall or decay to become the basis for new growth. We can continue to grow our trees for....well...forever if we choose!
Indeed, even in nature, there are trees living incredible life spans. The giant redwoods (sequoias) are thought to be able to live an astonishing 3.500 years! And while written texts go back as far as 5,500 years, none of us are likely to find written traces of our ancestors anywhere near so old. The oldest traceable family tree is of the Lurie family, dating back to 1037 BC (a stunning 3,063 years!) In more recent discoveries, DNA has unlocked more information on human history. Human DNA 45,000 years old has been found in Germany. And, DNA from Neanderthals has been dated to over 430,000 years ago! Thus far, my family seems very ordinary. As we stretch back in time, ordinary becomes less and less documented, and harder and harder to find. The oldest person in my tree is my 6th great-grandfather, John Martinus Homsher (1689-1747). 337 ago years seems like forever, but it's just s drop in the bucket.
I've intentionally grown my tree slowly. Despite being in my second decade of research, my tree is still young. This is in large part because, like many new family historians, I made mistakes...and LOTS of them! I started and scrapped multiple trees before I found my footing and felt confident in my research. My most recent tree (the one I swore to myself I would "do the right way this time" and never have to start over) was created in early 2021. So it's really only 5 years old. As of this post, I have 3129 people in my tree. Of those, only 38 need some form of documentation. Because I don't place a huge emphases on DNA matches, I've only placed 53 of them thus far (combined from both my and my ex-husband's plethora of DNA matches). I tend to prefer to find where they fit organically (when possible), rather than spending hours trying to dissect and document just to add one DNA match. Eventually, if I keep at it, many will find their way to their proper leaf.
Since my original purpose was to leave a more solid family history for my son than I had, I occasionally look at my tree from the perspective of him as the home person. I've located all his direct ancestors up to and including all of his 3rd great grandparents (both maternal and paternal.) And, out of 64 of his 4th great grandparents, I'm only missing 17. I must admit, he's not nearly as interested in genealogy as I am. He does occasionally enjoy hearing an interesting tidbit or two, but he doesn't share my passion for research. No matter, because I'll continue my search for decades to come! I don't think I'll ever tire of finding new discoveries...or having 20 browser tabs open in the relentless pursuit of one ancestor...or the satisfied feeling of finding where one more DNA relative fits in my tree.
Recently, Thomas MacEntee wrote about Newspaper Finder in his post Newspaper Finder: The Free Tool Every Genealogist Needs to Find Historical Newspaper Archives Online. The site has the potential to be very useful. But it's new. And new generally comes with some growing pains. I'll most certainly be keeping an eye to see how it expands and develops. They currently include 32 databases (all the major subscription sites like Newspapers, OldNews, NewspaperArchive, Genealogybank, and more). I have no doubt they'll be expanding their offering as time goes on. The site is entirely free to search. If you'd like to read another great user review of the site, head on over to Marian B Wood's post Checking Out Newspaper Finder on Climbing My Family Tree.
The one issue I had was the search results. Upon clicking on a pin on the map, they show as a list of the newspaper names, years included, and the website where the repository is located. It would be most intuitive to click the website (but those aren't hyperlinked). It took me a moment to realize you have to click on the publication name instead. Those are hyperlinked, but they don't really stand out. Once you click the publication name, you are taken to the site so you can do a more detailed search.
However, the location I needed in my research tonight wasn't coming up. To be fair, it only means this new site doesn't have a database where the particular location and potential titles I wanted are included. And to be extra fair, no one site is ever going to have 100% of anything. It's not really a limitation of the site....just a limitation based on the specific area I needed to search. So I did some more Googling and discovered another fantastic resource.
Talk about not being intuitive...the site is the Montana State University Billings (MSUB) library site. I know right?! How can a Montana college website be a great newspaper reference?! Well, under their History resources, they offer Historical U.S. Newspapers Online. The Home page for this section includes not only the option to search by state, but a section on other pages linking to websites with newspapers from many states. While some of these additional resources appear to be a little more specialized, it's still good information. Clicking on a letter in the menu bar takes you to the states, and each state shows an alphabetized list of newspapers with years. Clicking the link takes you directly to the site where you can do further searches. This site is also free to use.
I'm sure there's overlap between the 2 sites. But there are also differences. On the MSUB site, I was able to find a publication more suited to the data I was looking for...but sadly the years did not encompass the ones I need. But whenever I discover new tools (especially free ones) the time spent is never wasted. Both of these sites will be a great addition to your toolbox, and speaking of toolboxes, I've added both to my Genealogy Toolbox under Indexes/Databases/Newspapers.
Note: While both sites are totally free to search, some results are to subscription sites where you would need a membership to do further research.
Census records are a goldmine of information. As I've mentioned before, I like to mine all the details. This takes time. For a big family, it can be quite a bit of time. Often, I find myself zipping past census hints, in favor of something I can work on more quickly.
Recently, I decided to set out on the task of getting through some of those census records. They're important, and I need to stop glossing over them. I'm starting with the 1850 census. Using the Ancestry Hints By Specific Record Collection I previously wrote about, I'm able to see all the hints I'll be working with - only those hints (so I'm not tempted to bypass them). My only current goal is to make it through all the 1850 census hints I have. Then, I'll move on to 1860. Wash, rinse, repeat.
I'm not worrying about how many other hints this is adding on my main hints page. I'm simply plugging away at a concrete goal I've set for myself. While I'm making progress, I haven't been spending as much time checking out new features, updates, tools or websites. However, I was reminded recently about a handy feature on Ancestry I either never really paid much attention to, or forgot about - and it's a big time saver for my census journey. Let me explain the backstory...
I use a spreadsheet to transfer all the data from a given family on a census record. I like a standard way of formatting (using the concatenate function to string data together). Then I copy this data into a document before I begin updating each person in Ancestry. It leaves me with a list of all the facts I need to add, and a full summary to paste into my transcription field in the citation for each person. This is the simplified version. I have a few other steps in the process to get it to work just so, but you get the idea. I'm more than a little OCD about how I work with a census record. Certainly not everyone would want to go through my whole process, but I'm betting some of you have a process you like to follow.
In order for my spreadsheet to do its magic, I need to list each family member in their own column, not rows as a census is presented. I can't tell you how much time I've spent diligently transferring the contents of each row into the necessary columns (flipping back and forth endlessly between tabs as I entered the data in columns). And here's where I can't believe I've dedicated (but not wasted) so much time I didn't need to!
If you open the image of the census record, at the bottom of the screen is a little toolbar. We've probably all used the filmstrip view at some point. And I'd imagine everyone has used the arrows on the sides of the image to move forward and backward through pages....but how often do you use the index panel? Here's where to find it:
You might recall, I work on a small screen, so this next screenshot is not all the data. But it gives you the general idea of the format you'll see. Each line of the census is already transcribed!
The hard work is already done! Because I already have all the headings for each field in my spreadsheet, I just need to highlight, copy and paste all the family members into my spreadsheet. I do spot check fields like occupation, attended school, etc, just to be sure all the data is there - but most of the time it's very complete. I occasionally find a name transcribed incorrectly like "Susah" instead of "Sarah", but all in all, this saves me a ton of transcription time.
Now, if you've followed along this far, you might say..."Uh, Doris, you said you put each person in a column. You just copied rows." And you'd be right! I plop the copied data in my spreadsheet below where I want it. Then I right-click and copy it from within my spreadsheet, navigate to the first column for the data, and I paste-special (Excel) transposing rows and columns. This gives me exactly the layout I want to make my spreadsheet provide the specific formatting I use - all without having to do any (or very little) transcription myself. I'm going to hazard a guess and say this is saving me at least 50% of the time I spend working with census records.
I won't bore you with any more of the details on my personal process. But if you'd like to see a little more on how to grab all this information, I found this video very helpful. (I've added it to my Genealogy Toolbox under "Articles, Tips/Tricks, Guides".
While I still have to tweak a little for my own process, this is a huge timesaver! And as always, verifying is important. This isn't a substitute for making sure the transcription is correct (but it sure makes it a lot faster and easier to do). This feature is available on other images as well. And while I can't say for certain if every record set is as detailed as census records, you can be sure I'm going to start checking....right after I've finished my 1850 census project (and hopefully a few more years as well). Let me know if you already use this feature, or if you think it's going to help you in your own research.
