Echoes of Valhalla

In addition to Ancestry, I've taken a DNA test with 23andMe. I've known for some time 23andMe showed my my maternal haplogroup is T2b4. Although my haplogroup traces back to a woman who lived more than 6000 years ago, I'm far more interested in the T2b part of it. This has been linked to a female Viking warrior from the 10th century! I find my Viking ancestry just as interesting as I did the (now debunked) Cherokee story. It's more interesting because it's linked to my DNA. There's no story here. No ambiguity. It's scientific fact - DNA doesn't lie.

Let me start by saying, I'm well aware I'm never going to find any written or oral history taking me back to the age of my Viking ancestors. Ancient DNA results are really just another type of entertainment value in genealogy for me. But since I've always been fascinated by the Vikings, I'll embrace it. When I first found this interesting tidbit, I also shelled out a few bucks and did the Viking index score at Living DNA (where I had previously uploaded my DNA results for free.)

The Viking index is a little bit convoluted. My score is 76% and showed me being most closely associated with the Vikings of Eastern Europe. The 76% is the tricky part. This simply means my DNA is more similar to Viking DNA than 76% of all Living DNA users in their database. The key here is how many users are in their database. It's not a number they actually promote. This makes the score very hard to interpret. If they have 10,000 users, it's a lot less impressive than if they have 100,000 users. None the less, I was secretly pleased when I showed 20% higher than my ex-husband. At least I know they don't give everyone the same score.... I've investigated some of the other sites who'll match your DNA to multiple ancient samples. Most are fairly pricey, and since it is just entertainment for me, I'm not going to drop hundreds of dollars to see the results. 

Today I was really excited! 23andMe announced they're providing historical DNA matches to 23andMe+ premium users. Currently, they have 335 potential historical matches. I eagerly logged in to see the secrets my DNA revealed. Historical matches can be seen by selecting Ancestry and then Ancestry Overview. There's a new section called "Meet your historical matches". I showed 7 matches. While none of them were famous people (though it would have been nice) all my matches were to Viking age individuals! They ranged in time from 652 CE to 1200 CE. 3 were seafaring warriors, the other 4 were simply listed as Viking age individuals. 

This doesn't mean I'm directly descended from these matches (in all likelihood I'm not). But it does mean we share a common ancestor. While I only shared 1 segment with 6 of the matches, I shared 2 segments with one match. Of course the match percentages were extremely low, ranging from .06% to .13%. 3 matches were from Estonia, the others Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Far from conclusive, this seems to indicate perhaps a connection to the Scandinavian Vikings is as viable as those from Eastern Europe. Since Vikings explored many regions and their range was much farther than most people generally realize, there's a huge margin for error when it comes to trying to establish locations for Viking populations.

None the less, I'm thrilled to have more proof of my ties to the Vikings. Does it change my research? Not one iota. Is it really interesting to me? Absolutely! Female Viking warriors are often depicted as Valkyries, the mythological women (often on horseback) who ushered the dead into Valhalla. For now, I'll just think about how these new DNA "historical matches" are truly the echoes of Valhalla swirling through the leaves and branches of my family tree.  

Image by HANSUAN FABREGAS from Pixabay