30 December 2023

My Ancestry Year-In-Review

Ancestry.com is really good at providing metrics for users to know how many people they've added, how many hints they've saved, etc. I'm not a fan of the notification bell lighting up darn near every time I save something. In general, I don't find the "suggestions" useful and I summarily dismiss them (extra unnecessary clicks as far as I'm concerned, but I get it, they want user engagement...). I do, however, really like the metrics they provide on a weekly basis. 

Sometimes it's hard to quantify all the hard work we put in on our trees. Weekly updates help me realize while I may not have finished researching as many people as I'd like, or made it thru as many hints as I'd prefer, the work really does add up...and pays off...even if some of my branches still end in a brick wall. If the numbers are low, I can reflect on what kind of research I was doing the previous week. Some records, like census and obituaries, take me much longer to mine all the facts than say a public records hint with just address/residence information. Records with images take me longer to review than indexed only records. It's a quick and easy way for me to mentally analyze the work completed the previous week.

Ancestry just sent out a Year-In-Review email with more impressive stats! I do have to keep in mind I did a lot of work on a adoptee tree I started for a friend this year, and the numbers most definitely reflect this. For the adoptee tree, I absolutely took time to review each record, but I didn't add all the detailed and custom facts or transcriptions I use on my main tree. The adoptee tree was created for a singular purpose - finding the grandpa and grandma of a friend. With this in mind, my main tree probably only accounts for a quarter to a third of the counts listed in the image above, but I'm still pleased! 

One on-going task I completed for my tree this year was adding all the names from a trusted (and generally accurate) family history originally compiled in the 1930's and updated regularly over the years. This was no small undertaking and I'm glad it's completed. While this only strengthens one specific branch of my tree, and I still have tons of records to add as backup, it definitely makes the research path easier on the branch. I also started the DNA Academy course so I can better work with my DNA matches. I'm still working on my studies. There's a lot I need to learn and making sure I'm understanding and not just plowing through is important to me.

Just seeing my stats for the past year was invigorating! I'm really stoked as we prepare to move into 2024. I have a feeling it's going to be a very good year for genealogy! With my focus solidly back on my main tree for now, I'm excited to see what the new year has in store. If you've received the Year-In-Review email, or pay attention to your weekly stats, comment on one of my socials....I'd love to hear the successes you've had this year!

27 December 2023

Patience Required for Ancestry's New Media Item Categories

Ancestry.com
Ancestry rolled out some much needed new categories for user uploaded media items! (This includes media items saved from FindAGrave, Newspapers and Fold3, since those have always counted as user uploaded media). I was really excited when I noticed this yesterday evening. Being OCD, there was no time to waste and I set off to "fix" all the categories in my media gallery when I got home from work. Keeping in mind, my tree isn't huge by any standard (1571 media items) and here I am over 4 hours later and I'm just finishing up (...big sigh...). Making all the changes was far from painless.

Headstones and Sites/Buildings/Place were no problem. They really didn't need any changes (except a quick scroll through to look for anything I might have accidentally mis-categorized along the way). So far so good!

Then I tried filtering to Portraits/Family Photos and Documents/Certificates (at the same time) and tried selecting multiple items for edit. Well, there's apparently a limit to about 10 or so (I didn't actually count) you can select at one time. Ummmm....wait...you can't mass update them all to the same category at one time?! You have to change them one by one? And then go back to the media gallery when you hit the last one, re-filter and select 10 more? Not efficient at all. But I do like having obituary, newspaper article, yearbook and several other new categories to choose from.

OK...how can we better tackle this? Let's just use the right arrow start at the beginning and scroll thru them one by one. I mean, a lot of them are pictures anyway and won't need changes.... Oh wait! When you go back to the gallery to see your magnificent progress...new images crop up in between ones you know you already went past. I was beyond frustrated. I even sorted them alphabetically and went thru them again. Guess what? More cropped up when I went back to the gallery after making my way to the end. After a few more times of doing this, I devised a new plan.

I limited to just Portraits/Family Photos and painfully made my way through. After a 2nd and then a 3rd scroll down the page to make sure nothing else had magically appeared out of the genie's bottle, I limited to Documents/Certificates and started working through them. Ugggg....I had 3 newspaper items I changed probably 10 times each and while each time it gave me the gratifying little pop up showing my changes were saved, when I refreshed, they wouldn't retain the changes. And it wasn't like I maxed out on changes or anything. I could change other media items, just not those specific 3. I tried closing my browser. I tried another browser. I tried doing other changes and going back to them. No joy. Finally, in desperation I picked up my phone and edited them in the app (What's that you say? I've never posted about the mobile app? That's because I can't stand it! I'll only use it when my back is to the wall). That worked and now they're fixed when I log in via my browser. (That one tip may be the biggest thing you take away from this post, other than my growing sense of frustration).

And while photos have all those wonderful new categories, sadly, Stories have exactly....well...none. Never mind a lot of obits and newspaper stories are transcribed as Stories. Now WHY would users want to actually save like items together for easy retrieval? That would be too logical right? I can only hope they'll add a field for this in the future, but for the moment, Stories still remain lumped together regardless of what they may contain.

Oh, and one more thing! While you can filter many ways, including by person and/or place, you cannot search for a word in the title or description of a media item. To do that, you have to scroll endlessly until all the media are loaded for the category(s) you select, and then do a standard old Ctrl+F and hope for the best (and that's searching only the titles...no way to search inside the description or transcription). You can tag media now (which could eliminate some of the limited filtering) but there's no way I'm even going to consider going down the rabbit hole! I already use a custom tag on the person profile when interesting photos and/or stories exist. That's going to have to be enough. Even my OCD doesn't want to think about attempting tagging media after the immense fun I had with categories.

In conclusion, and because I have no mental energy left after painstakingly (and painfully) making my way through my media items, make sure you have time to dedicate to the task if you decide to take this on. I'm grateful Ancestry is expanding options for users. It's wonderful (truly it is) but I wish they'd make it a little less frustrating to use. After all, I've no doubt they'll use these categories (and tagging for those who choose to use it) for some purpose of their own at some point...all I wish is they'd make it a little less painful to use the new features they're rolling out. Maybe they should slow the roll and assess how all these changes are affecting site performance...

And now...I'm jumping down off my little soap box, tucking it under my arm and scurrying away to do something mindless like watch TV. There's no research for me tonight, categories took all the time and mental energy I had this evening.

25 December 2023

Unviewed Results Only - Another Ancestry Pro Tool

 

Unviewed results only
Wishing all my readers and followers a very Merry Christmas!

As I was researching the husband of a great-grandaunt this morning, I happened to notice an Ancestry Pro Tool I've not seen mentioned anywhere. To be fair, I haven't really been paying much attention to the hubbub since I signed up and wrote my post on my first impressions of the new features. My opinion hasn't changed...I still think the price is a bit high for the features...but if they add more useful tools in the future perhaps it will be more palatable. Public opinion seems divided. Some people love the new tools, and others agree it's pricey for what you get. Most folks can probably do without them (especially if you're using desktop software as well as Ancestry.com). 

When I clicked on the person search (magnifying glass) from the upper right hand side of person profile page for my target, I happened to notice a new option in the search results! There's a Pro feature called "Unviewed results only". While it's not the end all be all of search tools, I can say this is one I *might* actually use. If you've subscribed to Ancestry Pro Tools, you can check the box and select apply to remove links you've previously viewed from the search results. 

How many times have you stubbed your toe against your brick wall and wished there was a better way to filter through the plethora of search results? I know I've clicked on the same links time and time again (desperately hoping to see something new and different). Sure, good research etiquette would be to record the links as having been reviewed, but let's face it, who really has time to keep a lengthy log of links with no value? This new feature filters out links you've accessed previously (in the detailed search only) making it easier to see results you may still want to review.

While not labelled as a beta feature, I also didn't find anything about it in the support pages on the site. I don't think this one additional tool adds enough value to justify the cost, but I did want to take a quick moment to point it out. If you've decided Ancestry Pro Tools aren't for you right now, this one feature isn't so fantastic you should reconsider. But if, like me, you've signed up for Ancestry Pro Tools, give it a look next time you're doing a bit more searching. 

20 December 2023

What's Not Sync'd to FTM?

Since I started researching my family history, Family Tree Maker® (FTM) has been my desktop software of choice. It's no secret, I use Ancestry.com for most of my tree building and research, but it’s critical I have a backup of all my work just in case. For me, being able to reconstruct everything if there were a catastrophic failure is paramount. I don’t want to lose years of work! (I actually keep working 3 backups, but I’ll talk about those in another post).

FTM easily and reliably syncs both ways with Ancestry. 95% of the time I sync down from Ancestry, but I do occasionally make some smaller changes in the desktop software and sync up. Sure, there are users who have some challenges at various times, but I compact my database regularly, and make daily backups of my files. I personally have very few issues with the software. But this post isn't about all the features or reliability of Family Tree Maker®, it's about something some users may not think about…what doesn’t sync with Ancestry.com?

While the majority of tree content does sync, not everything does. It is not a 100% full backup either direction. The major data such as names, relationships, facts, sources, citations, repositories and most media do sync. Below is a synopsis of some of (what I think are) the more important non-syncing items.

Family Tree Maker® items that don’t syncAncestry.com:
  • Information/media marked private
  • Media categories, captions, audio/video files, archived web pages
  • Many types of notes (but general person notes DO transfer)
  • Web links
  • Color coding
Ancestry.com data that doesn’t sync to Family Tree Maker®:
  1. Comments
  2. Tags
  3. Web links
  4. Media location, original poster*, transcriptions*, headstone names/date
*Because the original poster is not saved and photos tend to propagate quickly on Ancestry, resulting in duplicates of duplicates of duplicates (ok, you get the idea!) I save the original poster information in the description or every piece of media I attach on Ancestry (unless I'm the poster). This way the poster info does transfer to FTM. I also save an additional copy of the transcription for documents in an "other source" citation I create, which also syncs. So while the info doesn't necessarily natively transfer, there are some step you can take to be sure you retain this information.

For more detailed information on what doesn't sync check out What's NOT synced to Family Tree Maker® page on the Mackiev website. Once you know what does and doesn't sync, you can adjust your backup plan accordingly. There's nothing worse than the sinking feeling you get in that moment you realize you just lost years of work you may not be able to reconstruct. As Benjamin Franklin said, "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."

14 December 2023

Ancestry ProTools Worth the Money?

 

Ancestry Pro Tools
 As a quick reminder, I do NOT receive any compensation (monetary or otherwise) from any links or posts. All opinions are strictly my own.

Christa Cowan, who works for Ancestry.com, announced the rollout of Ancestry.com ProTools in a Facebook post yesterday. I was intrigued and wanted to know more about them. I Googled to see what I could find, but information was scarce. There were a few YouTube videos, but most of the time, videos are not convenient for me, and I was hoping for written information. I'd been working on my tree yesterday, but hadn't seen anything about these new tools. I'd have very much liked to see a banner on my home page, like they do for DNA sales, announcing this new subscription option and providing detailed information on what this subscription model includes.

I searched online but didn't find any great information on how to access these tools or details about them. I eventually clicked on my account and went to my account settings. Here I was finally presented with an option to sign up for ProTools (and more information, albeit limited, on what was included). The tools are Charts & Reports, Tree Checker, Maps and Advanced Filters. At $9.99 per month (billed monthly), on top of what we already pay, the price seemed a little steep, but I decided to go for it anyway (I mean, I can always cancel right?) As soon as I subscribed, the options immediately displayed in both the drop down menu on the home page under trees, and also when viewing my tree. I wish they'd made this new feature a little more intuitive to find. Maybe it was just because it's new and my account hadn't updated with the new options yet. I'll give the benefit of the doubt. I did notice today the Ancestry.com help pages now have some information about the features.

Charts and Reports does present me with the elusive 7 generation fan chart some users had during beta testing (but I was never able to see). I most definitely like this feature! And it is viewable as not only names/dates, but also hints or photos so you can see easily see where you may want to do more research. This is the 2nd most helpful ProTool for my research (see below for the ProTool I think will be most helpful for me).

The Reports are nothing special in my opinion. If you use only Ancestry.com, you might find them helpful, but they're not much different from the reports desktop software, like FTM, has provided for years. They will be of limited use to me at this point. They include Descendancy, Ahnentafel, Register and Family Group Sheet.

The Maps have some really nice filtering options, and they may be fun to play around with, but they're certainly not essential to my research. I guess it really depends on what you want to learn about your family and/or what brick walls you may be trying to break down. I'm more concerned with people themselves at this stage of my research. With the filtering options available, they may very well be useful to some, just not so much for me.

The Tree Checker (with filters for possible errors selected) primarily found unknown children for my tree. Unknown children seem to be an issue for the algorithm. I'm constantly ignoring hints because they belong to someone else already in my tree. Plus, it also picked up all the people it was suggesting I might want to merge the unknown children with. I dutifully went through and told the algorithm they were not matches, and I cleared those up in short order. I was hopeful it would also tell the algorithm to stop suggesting useless hints for those incorrect matches, but it did not (...sigh...). 

It also accurately identified 2 duplicates (out of 2146 people) and found 3 facts more than 10 years after date of death. Those were typos on my part, and I'm happy they were called out so I could correct them. It's interesting, because I routinely attach facts to parents long dead when they're mentioned in the obituary of their children. These facts are often far longer than 10 years after the parent's death, but Ancestry did not flag any of these as a problem (thankfully!) I have a sneaking suspicion it's because I create custom facts for obituaries. I have to wonder if the algorithm could possibly be ignoring custom facts...I'll have to keep a closer eye to see if that might be the case. 

Compared to the MyHeritage consistency checker, I'd have to say Ancestry's Tree Checker is not as robust. Interestingly, I did not receive any warnings about siblings too close in age, or parents too old or young to have children (which can be helpful clues to grandparents raising grandchildren as their own, adopted children, non-parental events/misattributed parents or potentially incorrect birth dates). I do get these warning for a small number of people on MyHeritage (but I'm still looking for records to help me properly resolve). The 2 current options for this feature are "duplicates" and "other possible issues" but I've found no information on what those "other possible issues" it looks for may be.

From the Tree Checker, you can also access many other Advanced Filtering options such as: Family Line, Events and Places, Possible Errors, Hints, and filtering by Tree Tags. You were already able to filter by Tree Tags from your tree, but on this screen you can combine this with any of these other options. Of all the ProTools features, this is likely to be the one I will use most often and will be the highest value to me.

So, what's my overall opinion? I'd give Ancestry.com ProTools 3 out of 5 stars right now. Unless you have a compelling need for the tools or just like to try out new features, it's probably not worth the money at this point. But, and this is worth remembering, they could add new tools in the future. If they do expand the offering, I would certainly hope additional ProTools would be included in any existing ProTools subscription. And with room for this new feature to grow, it could potentially become much more useful over time. For the moment, I'm going to keep the subscription. Those on a budget may want to really consider if these tools are worth the cost. Had they been $4.99 or even $5.99 per month (even as a limited time sale price) I bet more users would jump on the bandwagon to try them. But $9.99 a month is a lot for many users to swallow. Only time will tell if this will catch on. I can't blame them for looking for new revenue streams. After all, companies are in business to make money. And, as users, we all want to see new features and enhancements on sites we use regularly. But I'm not convinced they may not have made the price a bit unattractive to a large portion of their user base. These are just my personal opinions after one day of testing out the new features. Your mileage may vary.

09 December 2023

Ancestry Support Related Links


www.ancestry.com
On various forums and Facebook groups, support is a common topic of discussion. As with any large company, many people seem to find dealing with Ancestry,com support a frustrating experience. Below are a few links I always keep handy to use when I run into issues on the site.

As we all know, it's not unusual to get a banner on various pages on the site saying Ancestry is experiencing technical difficulties, or can't display the item we're looking for....try again later or reload. To some extent, this is simply the nature of databases and websites. Technical issues do occur, especially during peak access times. But if you want to know if the service issue you might be experiencing is sitewide and actively being addressed, or simply a momentary blip, head to the Site Availability Status page to see the current status by service. This won't address every possible situation but it's a good place to start. If you see all the services in green, it's likely a short term problem. If you see red alerts, there's a known issue.

On several occasions, I've noticed a specific feature not working as intended. Although users may be discussing the issue widely in various support groups, many of these groups are not "official" and may not be frequented by anyone associated with Ancestry. There's often no way to really know if they're aware of the frustrations users are experiencing. Especially if the status page shows all is well, but a problem lingers for more than a few hours, submitting feedback may be worthwhile. Providing Feedback (even though you won't get a personal response) is a good way to communicate user concerns to the company. There was one time when I was unable to check the boxes or add notes for why a hint was accepted/ignored/undecided. I waited patiently for weeks but the problem persisted. Finally, I started submitting feedback every couple of days and included very detailed specifics on what I was experiencing Eventually, the issue was fixed (but I did have to be patient). I don't know if my feedback helped or not, but it certainly made me feel better knowing it was reported.

If you have an issue, such as membership/renewal concerns or you just want to try to reach support, you can start on the Contact Support page. You'll be directed to start with the virtual assistant chat bot they've named "Leif". If you can't resolve your issue with Leif, you will be provided information on contacting Live Support. I personally have never felt the need to attempt live support, but it does exist...though the actual support experience they provide seems to vary widely based on reports I've seen. Many users express frustration with live support, so you may want to save it for when it's really necessary.

As I do with most links referenced in my posts, I've included these on my Genealogy Toolbox page. If you haven't visited it before, take a moment to stop and check it out. Links are categorized with key features identified.

03 December 2023

Too Many Subscriptions?

 

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay
I typically don't do anything 1/2 way. I'm either all in, or all out. Found a sweater I like? And it comes in 5 colors!? I'll buy all 5! Pasta comes in 10 flavors? I'll buy one of each. So it's no surprise, I probably spend more annually on my genealogy addiction than the average person. 

For me, it's about the who, what, where, why, when and how of my ancestors. To bring people to life, I need lots of information. Will I be able to find something interesting on everyone? Certainly not! Will I find all the answers I'm looking for? Sadly, the answer is also no. But do I have the potential to discover something really interesting about just a few people? No matter what sites we're using, or how much (or little) we invest monetarily to do it, I'd like to think we all have the potential to discover something wonderful and interesting in our trees if we put in the effort!

Subscriptions are my kryptonite! Sometimes I question if I have too many. But then I tell myself, "Nah...all those subscriptions probably cost less than one annual vacation or in-person research trip". While that's probably true enough, I still ask myself, do I need or even use information from all those sites? The answer is ever changing and moves in waves. Some months, I don't go to a site at all. Other times, I wander over and kick my foot against my brick walls for hours on end, searching through various record sets for any tidbit or morsel. And sometimes, I'm on a quest for a specific piece of information, and I just want to have all the resources I may want to use at my fingertips. For me, the comfort is knowing I have the option to go search through databases and records whenever I want. Is it the best use of my funds? I'm sure some would argue it's not. But, I find great happiness and satisfaction in genealogy and researching my family's past -  so for me, it's money well spent. 

I'm all for a good sale, don't get me wrong! But I also realize companies are in business to make money. If they aren't doing so, they won't be around very long. I'm okay paying for subscriptions. It costs money for companies to obtain access to record sets, and to make those records available to us. Developing new DNA, tree and photo tools costs money too. Occasionally, I do enjoy finding a little savings here and there, but I don't go to great lengths to find them. It's much the same as I feel about software. It costs money to develop and maintain programs users (including genealogists and family historians) depend on for their daily tasks. I personally feel supporting those companies who make my joys possible is important. I like the convenience, and I want them to be around for years to come. 

So what sites do I subscribe to? Hang on! It's a long list!

  1. Ancestry (World Explorer) - where I do the bulk of my research and keep my public tree
  2. MyHeritage (Complete subscription)
  3. FindMyPast (Premium) 
  4. 23andMe+
  5. Newspapers.com (Publisher's Extra)
  6. Genealogybank
  7. NewspaperArchive (includes access to Storied)
  8. Billion Graves 
  9. Accessible Archives (lots of exclusive content)
  10. GEDmatch (Tier 1)
  11. DNA Painter 
  12. National Genealogical Society (NGS) 
  13. American Ancestors - New England Historic Genealogical Society (NEHGS) - they have an impressive collection of third party research databases
  14. Geneabloggers (resources for genealogy bloggers)
Researching your family history can range from free (if you're willing to put the extra time it takes) to very expensive (if you go on family heritage vacations, or do a lot of in person research trips).  There are certainly ways to keep costs manageable by utilizing sales, discount codes or taking advantage of month to month subscriptions as needed Each of us has different needs and wants when it comes to what we can afford and what we're willing to spend. Chime in on my social media and let me know what subscription sites are your "must haves".

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

24 November 2023

Black Friday 2023 - Deals, Discounts and Freebies

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Today is the day! Many genealogy sites offer the best deals of the year on Black Friday! Have you been thinking of subscribing to another site? Purchasing a DNA kit as a gift? Buying a gift membership to use for yourself in the future? Or do you just like freebies? Don't wait too long since these sales usually only last a few days. As a quick reminder, I do NOT receive any compensation (monetary or otherwise) from any links in my posts. 

One tip I typically recommend for Amazon Prime users is to save on shipping by popping over to Amazon and using your Prime membership to get free shipping. Ancestry charges almost $10 for standard 7-10 day shipping. With Amazon Prime, it's next day (or 2 days) free. I just verified the sale price of $49 is live on Amazon, so now is the time to take advantage of the savings!

If you're looking for freebies, head over to Genealogy Bargains to get 5 of Thomas MacEntee's genealogy books for Kindle for FREE! I've downloaded them in the past, and this is a generous free offer. Don't forget to sign up for his newsletter to stay on top of great genealogy discounts throughout the year.

MyHeritage is offering deep discounts on DNA tests today. Ancestry has sales on both DNA kits and new memberships. Newspapers.com is offering 30% off Publishers Extra subscriptions. FindMyPast is offering 25% off selected memberships. AmericanAncestors is running $30 off membership for a few days (and you get a discount to GEDmatch Tier 1 as a part of your subscription, along with access to an impressive number of outside databases). 23andMe is 55% off their Health and Ancestry option right now. LivingDNA and FamilyTreeDNA are also running special prices on their DNA tests. It's definitely the weekend to purchase if you've been eyeing any of these for awhile.

Remember, neither Ancestry nor 23andMe allow you to upload DNA results from other sites, but most other sites allow you to upload raw DNA data from the other large testing sites. If you have to pick just one DNA test to purchase, I'd suggest Ancestry. Not only do they have the largest database of users, but you can use DNA results on other sites to further research.

I admit, I have an addiction to subscription sites (a topic for another post). Admittedly, I do most of my research on Ancestry, but I really like having other sites available to me when I want to delve deeper. Genealogy subscriptions are my kryptonite! Of course, the goal of any business is to make money, but there are also tangible costs associated with scanning documents or obtaining access to various archived databases. I don't mind supporting the sites through a subscription model because my total annual cost is still probably less than a single research trip would be. What am I going to add to my subscription collection this weekend? I'll be signing up for both FindMyPast and American Ancestors. I still have 2 more sites I want to join (both for DNA tools) but they aren't on sale right now, so I'll save them for when I've finished my DNA course.

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

19 November 2023

Back to School: DNA Academy

Image by Arek Socha from Pixabay
This past week was a bit challenging for me. It's been harder than usual to focus, but I'm trying hard to stay on track. I started the course DNA Academy: Genetic Genealogy for Beginner's and Intermediate at learn.trace.com last weekend. I want to learn more about using DNA for my research. Being OCD, I prefer structure. There are tons of free resources out there on the web for learning about DNA, but for me, a reasonably priced ($250) organized course works much better. I spent some time reviewing options, and based on the course outline, decided this was the program for me.

The self-paced online course is estimated to take 5 weeks. I'm about 25% of the way through. Thus far, it's been predominantly learning/reviewing terminology and concepts. I have a feeling the hard work is yet to come. I've been trying to spend a little time every evening, or at least every other evening, working thru the modules. I'll post a more detailed review when I'm done with the course, but so far, I'm pleased with my choice and I believe it will be a help in learning how to more effectively review and use my DNA matches to enhance my research (and hopefully assist in breaking down my brick walls!)

DNA isn't going away. It will solidly be a part of genealogy in the future. Learning to work with it effectively will be key for all genealogists (casual and professional). Artificial Intelligence (AI) is all the rage right now too. While many companies have been using it in some capacity for quite some time (from simply "reading" records to creating photo enhancing apps) it's likely to take off by leaps and bounds now. The combination of AI and DNA will likely make DNA much easier for amateur genealogists to work with in the future. But, I'm a big proponent of knowing how to do my own research and analysis. AI isn't foolproof. It's machine based learning...key word learning. It is not infallible. If I don't learn how to analyze for myself, I won't be able to spot potential pitfalls in the data I'll likely be presented with in the future.

Image by Arek Socha from Pixabay

08 November 2023

A Life Well Lived - Francis John James Sr



Yesterday was the anniversary of my father's passing. I miss him so very much. He was my rock. As the youngest daughter, I was always daddy's little girl. I was born when he was 42 years old and my siblings were grown and off to their own lives, so I had a special relationship with my dad. Today, I thought I'd honor him with a post about his life.

Francis "Frank" John James Sr. was born 04 Oct 1926, in Wooster, Wayne, Ohio to Virgil Ray James and Jessie Virginia (Shelly) James. He was the third child of 8 (though the first child was stillborn, so he was always considered the 2nd child). His entire childhood and young adult life was spent on the family farms. 

Times were tight in the depression, and for years, every morning he'd get up before dawn and run through the woods checking his trap lines. Most of the time, his catches were put on the table for the family dinner (including squirrel, rabbit and possum (though he said he didn't actually eat the possum - but my grandma cooked it up and served it!) He helped with the animals, worked in the fields, chopped trees down and into fire wood (he said he enjoyed it) and in his spare time searched the freshly plowed fields for arrowheads. 

His father wanted him to do what those who came before him had done, be a farmer. He knew he wouldn't be happy and wanted to leave the farm and small town Ohio to join the US Navy during WWII. Since his parents wouldn't give their permission, he made a plan. He finished his senior year of high school in under 2 months, and on his 18th birthday, he left a note on the kitchen table telling them he'd left to go sign up. Upon arriving, the recruiter told him he'd have to be drafted. Undeterred, he went down to the draft board and asked them to draft him in (they did), for the duration of the war. He joined not because he had to, but because he believed it was the right thing to do. 


During basic training, he said you could always tell the boys who came from the farms. They were the ones who could complete the physical training courses with ease because they were used to doing much harder work on the farm. He was a "radio man". It really had nothing to do with the radio, though he did learn and enjoyed morse code. His main "job" was riding in dive bombers, keeping his pilot on task, making sure they stayed at safe altitude and watching for anything the pilot might need to be alerted to. He always said the most important thing was trusting your pilot. The dive bombers had canopies, but he said they usually flew with them open because they were prone to getting stuck and they wanted to be able to eject if the need arose (thankfully it didn't).


Though he was never deployed to battle (he remained stateside, stationed in Florida) he had many fun stories and memories he recounted often to anyone who was interested. He always started with "Did I ever tell you about....?" From the time they snuck a goat onto the 2nd floor of their barracks (much to the chagrin and annoyance of their commanding officer), to the time he split his uniform pants clean open doing "crack the whip" in a roller skating rink, and the time he had to repeatedly tell his pilot to "pull up...pull up!!!" because he was so focused on task, or the time he broke into another base to visit his cousin (Harold Shelly) stationed nearby (sneaking in by falling in line and marching into the mess hall, enjoying a nice dinner, and marching right back out without getting caught) - it was clear his time in the service was a very special and memorable part of his life. He said they all knew they were in for the duration, and there was a real chance they might not make it out alive, so they enjoyed a little harmless fun when they could.


One of his adventures I was always interested to hear about was his involvement with Flight 19, the planes lost in the Bermuda Triangle. He needed some flight hours, so he volunteered to ride along on some of the search flights. He was always interested in what happened, and had his own thoughts about the fate of the planes. Right up until he passed away, he'd read any new book published on the mysterious disappearance.

He never thought of his service as being anything special, and he was very modest about it. It turned out to be a springboard to a fascinating life of travel and adventure. He said joining up was the best decision he could have made for his life. 

During his time in the service, he met my mother in Jacksonville, Florida where he was stationed. They were married in 1947 and were together for 68 years! During the last years of my mom's life, he went to visit her every single day in the nursing home. He never missed a day, not even when he was tired or the weather was bad. They truly were amazing role models in my life.

After the Navy, he enrolled in what was then Tri-State University in Angola, Indiana (now called Trine University). He studied electrical engineering. He worked several jobs, including being a milkman and a radio/TV repair man to put himself through school and support the growing family (by then they already had 2 children). After college he joined Westinghouse as an engineer and had a 40 year career with the defense contractor. 

His job afforded him the opportunity to travel the world. I'm fortunate to have several of his old passports with stamps from around the globe. He'd regale us with stories from his travels. It was nothing for him to be in a foreign country and need to figure out how to get back home. Once, in Vietnam (where he arrived on an aircraft carrier but didn't have official stamps to be in country) he went to the consulate and ended up on an Air America flight with the CIA. I wish I'd recorded some of his stories. I recall bits and pieces of many of them, but not in enough detail to share with the humor he interjected. He always had a smile on his face when he spoke of his travels.

He retired from Westinghouse but continued to serve his community. He worked with Volunteers for Medical Engineering (VME) for many years. He designed and built items for people with disabilities when either the item they needed wasn't available or was too expensive for them. Once he revamped one of those child size battery powered cars to be remote controlled so a child who was born with no arms could experience "driving" the car (while his teacher was guiding it remotely). He was a devout Christian and was involved in his church right up until his death. 

He very much enjoyed woodworking and I'm so thankful I have many examples of his creations in my home. He also enjoyed being out in nature. Some of my fondest memories are of hiking and fishing with my dad. When I was a teenager, we took 3 driving trips cross country (just me and him in a 2 door Honda Civic hatchback with no air conditioning). I'm so lucky he gave me the opportunity to see so much of the country. Even now, people will ask me why I don't travel more or go places....and the answer is simple. My father already took me to all the places I could ever want to see! He was a loving grandfather to my son, and gave him many of he same experiences he shared with me.

My father lived to be 96 years old. He was still living independently and driving himself around two-weeks before his passing. For the last year of his life, he battled 3 kinds of cancer (one was extremely rare and there was really no viable treatment). But he never complained and he never wanted to burden anyone. I can truly say, being his caregiver in his last years was something I'm thankful for. I was able to spend time with him, talk with him, and make sure he knew just how important he was in my life. He remained at home right up until the day he passed. They took him to hospice mid-day and he was gone by the evening. He died on 07 Nov 2022 in Towson, Baltimore, Maryland.

For his funeral, I wrote the following: 

My dad was a wonderful and dedicated father, grandfather, husband, brother, uncle and friend - who selflessly put others ahead of himself. He volunteered to serve in WWII because it was quite simply, what he felt was the right thing to do. That one choice was the catalyst to a life full of travel and adventure most people can only dream of. He was a genuinely kind and caring person with a witty sense of humor, always ready to captivate with stories of his life. The impact he made on those he cared for was immense. His life, and inspiration to those who were fortunate enough to know him. He will never be forgotten and will live on in the hears of all he touched.

Even with all these words, I haven't begun to scratch the surface of what an amazing man my father was. I can't remember enough to share all his stories, and if I could, they'd fill books not blog posts. In his life he saw and experienced so much. He lived his life to the fullest and it was definitely a life well lived. I will miss him forever, but he lives on through the values he instilled in his family and the memories of everyone who met him.


02 November 2023

Distracted by DNA Part 2

Image by 652234 from Pixabay

I've completed my current project of adding all the names from my James-Gilmore Family History book. I now have 2089 names in my tree. I'm about to start figuring out where more of my DNA matches can be placed in my tree. There is some small overlap in matches amongst the various sites where I've tested or uploaded my DNA, but for the most part, each site offers me many matches I can't find elsewhere. I have a large pool of DNA matches to work with at this point. Most of the names are completely unfamiliar to me. 

I've been interested in learning about DNA Painter, so I signed up for a free account. I was concerned it would be hard to use, and I'd been putting off learning more about it. Using their help pages, I was able to easily map 3 of my DNA matches from MyHeritage.com. (It's important to note, Ancestry.com does not provide the information necessary to use DNA Painter). 2 of the matches are on my maternal side, one on my paternal. A sample of 3 certainly didn't paint much of my chromosomes, but it's a start and it was a great experience! The best surprise was finding out it was much easier than I had anticipated and I'm looking forward to doing more with it. Hence the reason I wanted to finish adding as many verified names as possible to my tree. I'm in a very good position to start working with paternal matches now (at least on my father's father's side). 

It also made me realize, while I really prefer Ancestry.com for most of my work, they really are lacking when it comes to some of the DNA features other sites make readily available. It's clear Ancestry.com  wants to keep users on their site as much as possible and they've done a great job at working towards the goal. I personally have dozens of DNA matches I've identified and placed in my tree from my Ancestry matches and I'd really like to be able to quickly map them on DNA Painter. The lack of segment data makes it virtually impossible, unless the same users have tested at one of the sites providing this information. Ancestry.com feels more like DNA 101. I find it fairly easy to work with my matches there, but I'm simply limited in what I can do with them right now. 

Learning more about working with DNA will be an ongoing "front-burner" project. I hope to mix my "normal" research routine with adding a few matches each week. If the matches are from a site other than Ancestry.com, I'll map them on DNA Painter. Since I have DNA at 6 different sites, I'll just hop and skip between them and try to keep the momentum going. I want to learn more about the various tools at GEDmatch and triangulation is high on my list of topics to read up on. It's exciting to be learning something new and I'm really hoping over time, it will help me break down the brick wall I've had since day one. Once I'm more comfortable using DNA and the various tools, I'll go back to the adoptee tree I'm working on and apply my newfound knowledge to try and identify the unknown birth mother of the adoptee. I'll post more about this part of my journey in the coming weeks.

Image by 652234 from Pixabay

28 October 2023

Distracted by DNA Part 1

Image by 652234 from Pixabay

It's been a particularly difficult week for me, in terms of motivation. Maybe I plowed through too much while I was on staycation....but I still want to keep moving ahead on my tree. I've picked back up my project of adding people from a well established family history book on my paternal side. It doesn't require a lot of mental energy, just time. The family history is typically very accurate and it's the fastest way to get to a point where I can figure out where to place more of my DNA matches in my tree. Why does this suddenly matter so much? Read on!

I was contacted by an Ancestry.com user who viewed the adoptee tree I'm working on for a friend. Let's call this person Sally (not her real name.) Sally was adamant there was no adoption in their family. She was sure of it!  Her husband John (not his real name) is a descendant of who we believe is the 2nd great grandfather of my friend. Based on information Sally provided, John is his 3rd cousin. Her initial contact was a little terse and I was concerned she was both put off and upset at the potential revelation.

Turned out, she was looking at a more distant relative in the tree (a 2nd cousin 1x removed), not the direct line I'm hoping to prove. There really was no adoption in the family she was familiar with. Still, I took the time to write back, and since her Ancestry.com profile shows she has many years of family history experience herself, I gently appealed to her to keep an open mind, since not all adoptions were talked about, and asked her to review what we think we've found and what we're hoping to use DNA to prove. Turns out, after reviewing what we know, she and her husband were very willing to help us try to find out more...incredibly eager actually! It was a very pleasant surprise. We've had several additional communications and she shared John's GEDmatch test kit number with me so I could do some comparisons. She also provided some additional contacts within the family we're exploring, and links to more information. As I learn more I'm looking forward to talking with Sally again! I believe there is value in communicating with any person willing to share. Maybe they have something to add to the tree...maybe not. But if I dismiss any potential research lead, I'd be doing a disservice.

With permission from my friend, I uploaded his Ancestry.com DNA results to GEDmatch. I used the one to one autosomal DNA comparison to John. This was the first time I'd actually looked at a comparison on the site, and to be honest, it was more than a little overwhelming. I'd run a few of their tools on my own DNA kit and there were lots of pretty colors, numbers, lines and charts, but it made virtually no sense to me. The results from John were no less daunting and I realized it's time for me to learn more about working with DNA details. What I think I saw was my friend matches John in several chromosome locations, and the total cM is within what would be expected for a 3rd cousin, but there was nothing spectacular. The good news is we now have many new GEDmatch DNA matches to research, using more detailed DNA information than is found on Ancestry.com.

Since it's easier for me to work with known DNA as I learn, I decided to jump over to my own tree and set out to learn more about working with DNA. I wanted to fill out as much of my paternal branch as quickly as I can to add new DNA matches, but I still like to have some documentation to support who I'm adding. Enter the family history book. I've been slowly using it to add to my tree over the last couple of years, but with no real sense of urgency. It seemed like a perfect time to hunker down and finish the project. (On my maternal line, where my biggest brick wall is, I don't have the luxury of a verified family history, only the research done by one family member. I'd prefer to continue to do my own research on the maternal line. Adding DNA matches there takes significantly more time).

I will definitely spend more time checking out GEDmatch (both for myself and my friend) but I decided maybe it's time for me to dig a little deeper and do some reading on working with DNA, so I can be more effective in my research. There are many wonderful free tutorials and I'm starting to dive in. It was an unexpected and wonderful surprise to be contacted by Sally. It just goes to show how open and kind some people in the genealogy community are. Even on social media, genealogy fans are some of the most wonderful people I've met and I value them all, whether they're related to me or not! In my next post, I'll update on what I'm learning using my own DNA matches.

Image by 652234 from Pixabay

21 October 2023

Clues in Cause of Death Codes

 

Snippet of death certificate showing ICD
Death certificates are a veritable treasure trove of information. From birth and death dates, last known addresses and the often elusive name and place of birth of parents are typically included. You're also likely to find the person's occupations, marital status and potentially names of spouses. The medical section can give clues to any ongoing health concerns as well as the primary and contributory causes of their death. The informant is quite often another family member, and sometimes the funeral home and location of the cemetery may be noted.  

I do want to caution information provided may not be 100% correct. These facts were most likely provided to the coroner by the informant, and there is a possibility of error. But none the less, the information may be a good jumping off point for further research. What I find extremely useful is the cause of death code.

The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is a standardized system for coding cause of death. It originated in 1893 and provided a more standardized way of of classifying the cause. It's used around the world and has been updated close to a dozen times over the past 130 years, now including specialized lists for Oncology and Miscellaneous causes such as Industrial Accidents.

These codes can help provide additional clues to family members who are no longer with us. The primary medical cause of death  and any contributing factors can often be challenging to decipher. We all know doctors don't always have the best handwriting! It can be frustrating to decode them, especially since some diseases have been renamed (or deprecated) over the years and may be unfamiliar. Generally, when codes are included, they're pretty easy to read. The only question is "what do they mean?"

Wolfbane.com International Classification of Diseases contains indexes of all the causes of death used since the 1893. Once you select the appropriate index year, the codes are listed in numerical order for simplicity.  The numbering does not necessary stay the same year to year, and referring to the incorrect year may not provide accurate information. Be sure to double check the year of death before referring to the ICD.

In the example above, the main cause of death for Willis Edward Berendes, who died before the age of 2, is listed as dysentery and the contributing factor as acute nephritis. This certificate is from 1920 and refers to ICD code 16c - other or unspecified dysentery. While this certificate wasn't terribly difficult to read, some can be like readying hieroglyphics. The ICD code is often the only way to decipher the cause of death. It makes me wonder what contributed to the diagnosis in this case? Unsafe water? Illness from improper cooking or contaminated food? Or was it a viral/bacterial infection sweeping through the area?

Take time to look at the cause of death codes when you find a death certificate. It only takes a few moments to confirm what the code means, and it may open up some clues you might not find elsewhere. I personally add a Cause of Death fact if I have one. It reminds me to  take a moment and reflect on what the person, or their family, may have been dealing with when the person passed on.

15 October 2023

Staycation Research Update

 

Image by Foundry Co from Pixabay
My week-long staycation is just about over. I was able to dedicate over 40 hours last week to my research. I wish I had more time, but it's back to work tomorrow. I have 6 people "pre-planned" for this coming week. There are a lot of records for these people, so my goal is simply to get thru these 6.

Since my last post on my new research plan (about 2 weeks ago), I reviewed and transcribed facts from 5 pages or handwritten notes my mother had assembled about her siblings and their children. This included several names, as well as birth and marriage dates I didn't have previously. I also added current and updated facts to several people based on an email I received from my maternal cousin a few weeks ago. I always cite this type of information as "Family Knowledge" and include the name of the person who provided the facts in my citation. 

I added 15 new people to my tree, for a total of 1572. Most new additions were 1st cousins 1x removed (children of my cousins and a few of their spouses).

Along the way, I also happened to run an "Undocumented Fact" report from FTM (my preferred desktop software). As expected, many entries were missing sources for sex (which should resolve as I work through my process) but I also discovered I had a bunch of facts I'd missed adding to sources somehow. As I'm reviewing each person, I'm resolving any issues as I'm completing their profile. 

I finished my review of 60 additional existing people in my tree, bringing my total completed to 99 (and nope, I just couldn't squeak out one more today to make 100). A few "completed people" have had hints pop up since my review (I'm not worrying about them right now), but in general my process seems to be working fairly well. As more record collections are added and updated, there will invariably be new hints for people I've already completed. Complete is only accurate until the next hint appears. And the beloved Ancestry algorithm is happily reaching out to find more hints for people on each branch of my tree as I'm working thru this new process. Shhhh...not that I'm looking at my hint count or anything.....but (...whispers...) it's up to  8240!

Image by Foundry Co from Pixabay

06 October 2023

OurRoots Promised to be the "Google for Genealogy"

Image by stokpic from Pixabay
Ourroots.com. Never heard of it? That's because it STILL hasn't launched. In a 04 November 2020 post on the Rootsfinder blog, Dallan Quass, PhD (a developer who's been involved with many reputable and successful genealogy sites) proclaimed it would be the "Google for genealogy", a search engine indexing "(almost) all genealogy on the web." It was supposed to launch 2021 and it was bound to be impressive, right?

As 2021 turned into "the pandemic", the launch date shifted to 2022. Then it shifted again to 2023. And as of the date of this post (although the ourroots.com site hasn't been updated with this information) the original blog post on Rootsfinder.com now states "Unfortunately, due to extenuating circumstances the google for genealogy project has been indefinitely postponed." Is that really indefinitely postponed? Or has it been shelved forever? 

In theory, it sounded amazing! We all know how frustrating it can be sifting through Google search results....or worse, not having any viable results appear. Ourroots.com could've been the solution we've longed for and dreamed of. Imagine a search engine returning untold numbers of relevant results to our eagerly waiting fingertips. Oh, how the brick walls might've crumbled...!

Such a great concept, but will the miracle ever happen? I rather suspect indexing all those sites was a bigger project, requiring far more working capital and programming, than anticipated. They also claimed you'd be able to upload records and books (possibly some copyright issues there??) as well as your tree, and they'd make them searchable too. That's certainly a lot of moving pieces...and promises. 

There is an ourroots.org site. It's a database management system for genealogy societies where they can upload records, media and books and make them searchable on their websites (hmmm....sounds a little familiar...was ourroots.com going to springboard off this?). This open source project appears to have had some success (how much is hard to tell). There's a Facebook page withs posts in late 2022 with users asking questions. But the last GitHub updates appear to have been 8 months ago. Though there were some "see it in action" links making it appear functional, it looks like maybe this project stalled as well.

I have to wonder if ourroots,com will ever actually sprout into a full fledged search engine after all. I hope this venture eventually reaches fruition. It could be a game changer for amateur (and maybe professional) genealogists everywhere. For now, we're left wondering whether this grand idea will ever see the light of day.

Image by stokpic from Pixabay

30 September 2023

My New Research Plan

 

Image by Micha from Pixabay
To this point, I've done my research using the hop, skip and jump method. I surfed from person to person attaching mostly the "easier" hints. Sure, I did plenty of census records and obits (both take me a long time to mine all the details). Generally speaking, working this way allowed me to keep all 4 branches of my tree growing. But now, I'm at a point where I need to buckle down and tackle one person at a time. I'm spending too much time clicking next page...next page...looking for the easiest hints. Most of the records I'm skimming through are going to take longer, as they contain more details and typically more people. I have to be in a different mindset to buckle down and tackle the hints I know will take longer. So, I'm changing up how I work entirely.

Recently, I read an article on the value of going back to review existing people in my tree instead of just focusing on adding more new ones. I decided I want to go back and look at any hints I've previously ignored and all my suggested records for each person (since they don't necessarily always show up in the new hints). I know I had marked many photos ignored because there were multiple copies in my new hints, and in some cases, the one remaining photo in new hints has now disappeared altogether (and I now need to reconsider those ignored hints). Not to mention, a hint that seemed irrelevant/incorrect in the past may actually be relevant as new data emerges. I definitely think taking time to review is worth the effort, and will help me make better progress in the long run.

To be fair, my haphazard technique has taken me a long way in the 3 years since I restarted my tree. I have 1557 people, the vast majority of whom have at least a few records attached (most have far more, but unknown children may not have any). I know it's not a huge tree by any standard, but I'm very comfortable with the accuracy. A family member (a DNA match who initially reached out to me, and now we've become great friends) recently gave me the ultimate compliment! She said "You are soooo thorough. Actually, one of the best trees I have ever seen!!" I'm not sure I'd go that far. I don't do everything to the highest genealogical standards, but I am consistent about how I record all my details and my system of citing and transcribing work well for me. The compliment sure did make me feel good though, and it makes all the hours of work worth every second!

But now, I'm switching to a more detailed research method. I've decided to work by the person ID my desktop software assigns. I easily exported the data to a spreadsheet and it's super simple to track my progress. I'm starting with person 1 and working my way through. I considered working alphabetically, but this way I can more easily quantify my progress. I'm going to try and put my OCD aside and pay no attention to how many little green leaf hints I have. (7800+ last time I checked, which feels absolutely overwhelming!) Instead, I'm methodically reviewing existing ignored and undecided hints and checking all the suggested hints to be sure I haven't missed any. I'm also integrating any links I've accumulated in my notes as I check each person. I'm processing every suggested hint and completing each person before moving on to the next. Just an observation, the latest census record for any given person generally seems to yield the most suggested hints in the sidebar. Not sure why, but there are typically more than say looking at the suggested hints when reviewing a public record. 

As I stand at this fork in the road, I'm embracing this new plan, I've completed 39 people in the last couple weeks and I'm settling into my new rhythm. The progress will be measurable, and it's helping me stay focused. I'm keenly aware the number of people and new hints will grow exponentially for the foreseeable future. My main focus is on suggested hints from Ancestry (and I know they're by no means complete). But for the most part, I'm not digging beyond those just yet. I'll save deeper research for when I'm finished with my review and I'm ready to bust some brick walls. I'll definitely look further and refer to other sites when I feel like I'm missing critical facts to fill out a person's profile. I'm not going to limit myself just to Ancestry (remember, no one site has all the information!)...but it's my main research site, and for the most part, it gives me a very good start on each person. I'm sure I'll come to another fork in the road, and will change up my methods again in the future. But for now, each person I complete feels like an accomplishment and I'm no longer click, click, clicking through pages of hints without actually doing anything. It feels good to be back on track and making progress!

Image by Micha from Pixabay 

22 September 2023

Plague Doctors and Pandemics


Image by Sabrina Belle from Pixabay
As I'm coming off my second time with COVID-19, I was thinking about pandemics throughout history. Pandemics, epidemics and plagues have been around since at least 1350 BC (the plague of Megiddo, unknown number of casualties). And while COVID-19 has certainly ravaged the world as we know it and changed how we live (probably forever), it's hard to imagine how those who came before us must have felt in the face of even greater suffering and devastation.

I have to be honest, plague doctors fascinate me. I love the whole creepy mask thing they had going on. But they were often far from being any kind of  healer (and most were nothing more than snake oil salesmen making money off fear). They offered no cures for the sick and essentially became death trackers, compiling records of the dead. What I wonder most is how many plague doctors died? The only count I've come across was from Venice, where 18 plague doctors were hired. In 1348, only one was left. 5 died and 12 fled. Despite being unscrupulous characters in history, their image has become iconic, especially in the genre of steampunk

But getting back to pandemics...an estimated 75-200 million lives were lost to the Black Death (1346-1353), 17-100 million to the Spanish Flu (1918-1920), and the list goes on. Read the Wikipedia on this subject and it's terrifying just how many illnesses have devastated the world many times over. The sheer magnitude of these events is mind blowing. We live in a time were many will see one, maybe two, such catastrophic events in their lifetime. But look at the 16th-19th centuries and it seems like the list is never ending....one after another emerging and decimating vast populations (large and small) around the world. Our ancestors had to cope as best as they could. Isolation (if they were lucky enough not to live in a city) was likely the best hope of survival. For those who lived in crowded and unsanitary conditions, the outcome was certainly grim. I can only imagine the horror of being surrounded by the dead and dying in such horrifically dismal conditions.

Imagine when there was no social media, no internet, no tv, no radio, and few printed/written materials. Word of mouth depended on someone living long enough to pass information along to the next person. We're fortunate to live in a time when we benefit from advancements in medicine. Ongoing research, vaccines and the simple ability to communicate quickly to the masses are all critical to stemming the death toll. But just like our ancestors, we would all be wise to understand nature is still stronger and smarter than us. We will always be at least a step behind. Viruses, bacteria and the smallest living organisms will continue to morph and evolve and new threats will always be on the horizon. The most we can hope for is to learn from the past, and keep our eyes on the future.

Image by Sabrina Belle from Pixabay

17 September 2023

Daddy's Ditties

Image by Andrys Stienstra from Pixabay
I was feeling a little nostalgic yesterday. So much is lost as generations come and go. When I was wee, my dad used to say little ditties while we were riding in the car. I have no idea who wrote them,  where he heard them or how many are out there on the internet. From a quick Google search, some of them are out there in various forms, but worded a little differently or much longer than what I recall him saying. I was thinking about them last night and decided to post what I remember. 

My dad used to grin like a Cheshire Cat and chuckle after he'd say any of these. Clearly, he repeated them enough times they stuck with me all these years. Do you have any little ditties your family shared? And do you share them with the next generation?

If you're squeamish, skip the last one! 


Before I knew biology, the dangers of a kiss.
I thought that kissing you was the nearest thing to bliss.
But now I know biology and I just sit and moan.
10 million mad bacteria and I thought we were alone.


The mule he has two legs behind, and two he has before.
You get behind, before you find, what the two behind be for.


Johnny was a chemist.
But Johnny is no more.
For what he thought was H2O,
Was H2SO4.


One bright day in the middle of the night,
Two dead boys got up to fight.
Back to back they faced each other,
Turned around and shot each other.


Repeat after me:
"Whatta"
"Goo"
"Siam"
Now put it all together:
"What a goose I am. "

 

STOP HERE IF YOU'RE SQUEAMISH! 


My bonnie has tuberculosis,
My bonnie has only one lung.
She coughs up big yellow oysters,
And wallows them over her tongue.


Image by Andrys Stienstra from Pixabay