24 December 2024

Balancing Life, Health, Work and Family Through the Generations

Image by No-longer-here from Pixabay
This past year brought unexpected challenges to my life. Lately, I've been reflecting on my ancestors and how they balanced life, health, work and family...the same challenges we each face today. How did they manage in a world where medical and techonogical advances (we often take for granted) simply didn't exist? How did they have the fortitude to survive...and even thrive?

I've wondered if they ever felt angry or frustrated as they navigated the ups and downs of life. How did so many of the early generations find the courage to leave their home country (or state) and set off in search of a new and hopefully better life? If they'd known the challenges their lives would be filled with, would they have made different choices? Or were they happy with how their lives turned out, perhaps counting their blesssing every time they saw another sunrise? My father used to say "any day you're looking down at the ground, instead of up, is a good day." 

The lives of my ancestors help me find balance in my own life. Researching them provides a sense of fulfillment, and it reminds me to be thankful for all I have. Though I've had to scale back in the recent months, I'd be devastated if I couldn't continue my genealogical journey. I'm very thankful for all the people and websites who make researching from home possible. As genealogists and family researchers, we're so fortunate to have access to so many repositories of information. It's hard to imagine how much data is sill uncataloged, patiently waiting to be revealed to us, little by little in the years to come!

This past year, Ancestry tells me I added 579 people to my tree,  All but 25 people in my tree have some kind of record attached. I reviewed thousands of hints in 2024. I was thrilled to satisfactorily confirm several new direct ancestors. And Ancestry's ThruLines even turned up a tantalizing breadcrumb...a potential sibling or half-sibling, in my search for Abijah, the ancestor who started my journey. I was also excited to see (on 23andMe) I now have 10 confirmed ancient DNA matches, all to the Viking era. 

As we approach the end of 2024, and look forward to 2025, I hope everyone has a safe and happy holiday season. While we come from all different corners of the world, the genealogy community feels like a big extended family. I'm thankful genealogy is a part of my life. Happy Re searching!!

Image by No-longer-here from Pixabay

23 July 2024

Pressing Pause

Image by AndyPandy from Pixabay
Due to unexpected circumstances, I will not be posting on a regular schedule. I hope to continue sharing sporadically, when I'm able. I want to thank everyone who's visited my pages and taken time to read my posts this past year, I truly enjoy sharing my genealogy journey and interacting with everyone. I hope, in the future, to be able to pick back up again. But for now, blogging has to take a backseat to other priorities. 

Image by AndyPandy from Pixabay

21 July 2024

5 Star Posts Week of 07/14/2024 - 07/20/2024

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
Staying abreast of happenings in the genealogy community is vitally important to me. There are hundreds of posts each week to sift through, on a wide variety of relevant topics. I'm so thankful to all the geneabloggers (and other content creators) who educate, enlighten and entertain me by sharing not only their stories but information I need to know.

Below are a few of the posts I think deserve "5 stars" this week and I'd like to share them with you.

New: Relationship Diagram Now Supports Very Large Family Trees by Daniella on MyHeritage Blog

Are Ancestry Pro Tools Worth the Money? by  DiAnn Iamarino Ohama on Fortify Your Family Tree

Same Family, New Tree: MyHeritage Brings Its Family Tree Tools to FamilyTreeDNA by Katy Rowe-Schurwanz on FamilyTreeDNA

Bad Words In Genealogy by Will Moneymaker on Ancestral Findings

Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:

Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 14 to 20 July 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings

Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

This week’s crème de la crème — July 20, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

17 July 2024

A Small But Useful Change to Custom Facts on Ancestry

Ancestry Custom Event
I'm a big fan of custom facts/custom events in my Ancestry tree. I use them for marriages (when I'm not researching the spouse), obits, draft card, interesting facts, newspaper articles, stories and the list goes on. I probably have around a dozen or so custom labels I routinely use. One of my pet peeves was when I was attaching facts to a source, the fact itself was in the list of available items to attach, and the date, locations and description would show, but the label wasn't displayed. 

It seems like a small thing, but when I'm attaching facts, I often have a checklist to be sure I've added every type of fact saved for the particular record. It was slightly annoying, as when I had multiple custom facts, I had to be careful to make sure I was selecting the proper one. I had no labels to help me. I've long wished the title/label on the fact would be displayed.

Last night, I added an Obituary custom fact to one of the people in my tree. When I went to attach the facts to the source, imagine my surprise! I could see the title - Obituary! I was so surprised, I thought perhaps my eyes deceived me! So I added a custom "test" fact (shown below):


Then, I randomly went to a source and clicked on Associated Facts. When I scrolled down, I was SO happy to see this!

I truly hope this is a permanent change and not just a limited beta test! It makes using custom facts a bit easier for those of us who use them regularly, and perhaps the algorithms will eventually learn the common types of custom facts we're using. Maybe one day, some of them will become standard options. In any case, I know I sometimes complain about Ancestry, but in this case, it's a small change they got very right! Thank you Ancestry!

16 July 2024

Atlas of Historical County Boundaries

Image by pinkzebra from Pixabay
Using maps isn't the first resource to jump to mind when I'm researching my ancestors. Sure, I often pop over to Google to see how far apart a couple of cities may be, but I don't really enjoy using maps as a whole. I also frequently plug in a zip code and ask Google to tell me the county it's located in. But this only tells me where the cities or zip codes are now. Often, it's more helpful to know where they were in the past. There's no denying boundaries have shifted over time and having a research tool to assist when questions arise is important. One site I've visited, with easy to use features for the United States, is the Atlas of Historical County Boundaries from The Newberry Library (Dr. William M. Scholl Center for American History and Culture). This site is totally FREE.

From the website:

The Atlas of Historical County Boundaries is meant to be a resource for people seeking records of past events, and people trying to analyze, interpret and display county-based historical data like returns of elections and censuses, and for people working on state and local history projects.

The core of the site is the interactive map (conveniently located on the homepage). You can easily explore historical boundary changes over time, as well as find much more detailed information on these changes. There are detailed instructions (along with videos) on using and navigating the maps. And there's a FAQ section for additional information. They also provide downloadable GIS, KMZ, and PDF files with explanations on the uses of these files.

Searching is simple and straightforward. Just click on a state from the map on the main page or use the search box to select one. You'll be presented with maps, indexes, chronology, sources, commentary and downloads. Each section is clearly indicated and they're all displayed on one page for easy access. Within the maps, you can further select a time period for the historical borders you want to learn about (one of the best parts of the site!) Using my home state of Maryland as an example, I could see boundary changes ranging from 1638-1997. I can't fit all the date changes into a single image because there are so many it needs a slider, but this gives you an idea of how it appears. (For such a small state, we sure had a lot of boundary changes.) Having all this information in a single, easy to use place is just the kind of tool I need! 

The county chronologies include dates of creation, name changes, and boundary adjustments. This helps genealogists and family historians identify where records may be located over differing time periods. This can be helpful when searching for censuses, land deeds, probate records and much more. Each state has a historical commentary section providing context and further explanation for boundary changes. Understanding why boundaries changed may offer further insight into historical events impacting your ancestors lives (including why they may have migrated to other areas).

Maps will probably never be my favorite research tool. But as with all tools, it's important to know they exist and the times we may want to use them. One could search for ages for records in a given area, but if the particular location wasn't the same in the past, all those search efforts may be in vain. Finding a city shifted counties in the past could potentially be a brick wall buster! By utilizing the Atlas of Historical County Boundaries (linked in my Genealogy Toolbox under Mapping) you can enhance your family history research, gaining a clearer picture of where to find historical records and understanding the geographic context of your ancestors’ lives.  

Image by pinkzebra from Pixabay

14 July 2024

5 Star Posts Week of 07/07/2024 - 07/13/2024

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
Staying abreast of happenings in the genealogy community is vitally important to me. There are hundreds of posts each week to sift through, on a wide variety of relevant topics. I'm so thankful to all the geneabloggers (and other content creators) who educate, enlighten and entertain me by sharing not only their stories but information I need to know.

Below are a few of the posts I think deserve "5 stars" this week and I'd like to share them with you.

Facing uncertainty by Daniel Loftus on Dan's Thinktank

DNA and Law Enforcement by Kitty Cooper on Kitty Cooper's Blog

Southern Militia Ancestors Hiding in the Bush by Kathleen Brandt on a3Genealogy

While We're Melting by Jacqi Stevens on A Family Tapestry

The most ancient human genome yet has been sequenced—and it’s a Denisovan’s by Ann Gibbons on Science.org

Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:

Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 7 to 13 July 2024  by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings

Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

This week’s crème de la crème — July 13, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

11 July 2024

Pursuing Knowledge in Genealogy and More on ThoughtCo

Image by Pablo chaves from Pixabay
While I'm not a professional genealogist, I know how crucial it is to continue learning. Knowledge is power (so said Sir Francis Bacon). So how about a great site you may not have heard of before? It's not a research site, but it is an educational site. ThoughtCo "is a premier reference site with a 20+ year focus on expert-created education content." And guess what? They have so many articles on genealogy! And guess what else? It's FREE!

While the link I've included above takes you directly to the genealogy section, if you go to ThoughtCo's homepage, you can select from many, many other categories and topics. Genealogy is found by clicking on Humanities > History & Culture > Genealogy.

They offer articles on genealogy basics, researching in specific areas, tools and how-to's, working with photos, DNA, reunions and the list goes on and on. There's even one article on The Cherokee Princess Myth I wish I'd read before I started my journey. Articles link to additional sites as well as other articles on ThoughCo, so you can continue to expand your knowledge. The writers for this site have advanced degrees in their subject areas, and collectively they've written over 40,000 articles! 

Once you start reading, you may find yourself clicking through to all kinds of interesting topics! Expand the Genealogy section and you'll find subtopics of Basics, Surnames, Genealogy Fun and Vital Records Around the World. Each section has dozens upon dozens of articles. Conveniently, they also have a number of history sections from specific places to time periods. Combine this with the genealogy articles, and you may find yourself tumbling down the rabbit-hole for hours!

I've included ThoughCo.com in my Genealogy Toolbox under Articles, Tips/Tricks, Guides. I hope you'll take a few minutes (or hours if you have time to spare) to check ToughtCo out. Leave a comment or connect with me on social media and let me know what you think of the site.

Image by Pablo chaves from Pixabay

09 July 2024

Comparing Text

Image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay
I've read posts by others about comparing text from two different sources to identify the differences. I certainly saw the benefit of doing this, but never had a big reason to do it myself - until now. 

The other day, I was working with an ancestor who had several different obituaries published (in different newspapers and online). Obits can be substantially the same or they can be vastly different. Since they take a long time to mine details from, I wanted a way to see the differences. It they were identical (without having to read a few words at at time to compare), I'd know I didn't need to "re-mine" a particular version of the obit. And if the copy I worked from contained all the pertinent details also shown in another version, linking it would be much faster as I wouldn't need to create additional new facts (though I'd still need to link all the matching ones). 

I set off to find some free online tools for making the comparison:

  • Diffchecker.com  - Compare text, images, Word, PDF, Excel to a like file. Differences are highlighted for easy recognition. While additions and deletions are highlighted, it takes looking at both to spot all the differences.

  • GoTranscript - Easy to use, offers option to ignore capitalization and punctuation. Additions and deletions are clearly identified by color in one spot, making it easier to see the differences.

  • SEO Magnifier - Allows comparison of text via copy/paste, URL or documents. Accurate, and easy to spot deletions, but additions are slightly less pronounces.
All three free options get the job done without much fuss. For the task at hand, straight up text comparison, I actually preferred GoTranscript for the visual simplicity. The results were the most natural for the way my brain processes. It happens to be the site with the least bells and whistles, but it's my top pick.

Diffchecker offers other comparison options beyond just text. It includes comparison of images, documents (Word and PDF) and Excel. This could be helpful for a number of different tasks. It also has a desktop version available (but I did not install or test it). SEO Magnifier offers a considerable number of additional online SEO tools content creators may find helpful. The average genealogist may not be interested in SEO, but those who create for others may very well find SEO Magnifier offers additional benefits.

Of course, I've included links to these sites in my Online Tools section of my Genealogy Toolbox. So,  next time you encounter the need to compare two sets of text for differences, hop on over and give one of these sites (or all of these sites!) a try!. 

Image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay

07 July 2024

5 Star Posts Week of 06/20/2024 - 07/06/2024

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
Staying abreast of happenings in the genealogy community is vitally important to me. There are hundreds of posts each week to sift through, on a wide variety of relevant topics. I'm so thankful to all the geneabloggers (and other content creators) who educate, enlighten and entertain me by sharing not only their stories but information I need to know.

Below are a few of the posts I think deserve "5 stars" this week and I'd like to share them with you.

Ancestry ProTools - Family Tree Fan Chart by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings

Top 5 DNA Genealogy Testing Sites by Diane Henriks on Know Who Wears the Genes in Your Family

JULY TECH MOMENT: SNAGIT by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

Who provides the most value? DNA testing and Beyond by Valorie Zimmerman on South King County Genealogical Society

Power-Up Your DNA Analyses by Leah Larkin on The DNA Geek

Pennsylvania Genealogy Research Guide by James M. Beidler on FamilyTree

Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:

Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 30 June to 6 July 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings

Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

This week’s crème de la crème — July 6, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

04 July 2024

Share Your Journey This Independence Day

Image by free stock photos from www.picjumbo.com from Pixabay
I wish everyone a very Happy 4th of July! 

On this day when many are gathering with family and friends to celebrate the holiday, take time to share about your genealogy journey. Yes, yes, I know - some eyes may glaze over as you speak, but don't give up! Talk to the children and regale them with interesting stories you've discovered. Show them pictures from times gone by. Listen, so the older generations might share their stories with you. Record them if possible or take notes so you can write their recollections down for future generations. One day, you'll be very glad you did. Share new discoveries with your elders. They may be thrilled to hear the stories. And, it may spark memories you've never heard before.

This is a day to celebrate our country, our independence and most of all, our family journeys. Many of us have traced far enough back in our lines to discover ancestors who fought for independence. We owe these ancestors a great debt of gratitude. Other families immigrated to a this country later, leaving all they knew behind. It doesn't matter from where your ancestors came, or when they came, today we celebrate together!

Remember all those who've bravely served their country. If possible, thank them for their service. For those no longer with us, say a silent thank you to honor their memory and the sacrifices made to ensure the independence we enjoy today.

Today is a day to be grateful for all who came before. It's a day to be thankful for all the resources available so we can uncover and discover our ancestors. Today, I'm deeply thankful I embarked on my genealogy journey and for all the wonderful discoveries I've made (and have yet to make). Happy Independence Day!

02 July 2024

OCD and the New Hinting for Ancestry Member Trees

Image by Patrisia Novianti from Pixabay
I've written before on my opinion on The Value in Other Member Trees. I still feel they have merit (personal opinion). I know many people don't care for them. But I have a HUGE gripe about the way Ancestry recently changed the hinting for these trees.

I was fine getting three member tree hints in one. I'd check the first one for parents, siblings, spouses and children to be sure it looked like I had everyone. Then, I'd accept all the trees, but I always unchecked all the boxes so nothing was added to my tree other than the source. It was fine. It let me have a quick double check and gave me some future sources if I needed them. Occasionally, another member tree hint would pop up randomly for someone, but it was absolutely manageable.

Now, they pop up like Wheat Thins....one after the other! (For those of you who remember the Sandy Duncan commercials...Oh, how I'm showing my age!) For someone with OCD this is absolutely maddening. I happen to like numbers (preferably even numbers, but 3 hints in 1 was ok). When I set out to research, I generally try to drop my hints by 20 per day, as it's also a way to remove one full page of hints (sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't). But I have a goal - one fitting into the time I have to spend on Ancestry in the evening. One I can usually attain in a few hours. I usually flip between types of hints, but when I'm running out of steam, I'll pop over to member trees for a quick way to reach the magic number and cross the daily finish line.
 
Now, I accept a member tree, only to be presented with another, and another. So it takes me three times as long to work thru what appears to be 20 of this type of hint. It's ridiculous! Over on the Facebook group, there have been numerous complaints. Supposedly, Ancestry did research and found one by one had the best interaction. (Of course it will if there's no other choice...sigh.) I don't know who they were talking to, but I don't know anyone who prefers to do something 60 times rather than 20. If they actually contained truly relevant and different information, sure. But they don't. The last two hints are typically the same as the first and since information is often unsourced, they're best used for reference only. 

I suspect they're trying to get more users to click thru to other member trees. Guess what? I check the first one and I just plow through the next two. It's no different than before in this respect, I'm just angry while I'm doing it. Sure, I could ignore all these hints entirely, but I actually do want them in my tree. And guess what else? If you look in your sources, Ancestry apparently doesn't want to store three times the data. They merge it into one source where you still click the same link to see all three trees. All they've done is increase the work and frustration for users of the platform. And I rather suspect, more people will turn them off completely (or totally ignore them) to avoid the hassle. 

If they're angling to have a slowdown in use, so they can justify removing them entirely - then just do it. If they really want them to be valuable enough for users to spend three times the time on them, then check the accuracy and validity of the trees. Don't just present me with user trees with no documentation (or only other member trees as sources). How about Ancestry uses them there Top Tree  badges they've created to filter out the less helpful trees and give us something worthwhile. I might praise the change if they did so, as it might actually point me to where some of the (currently) unsourced information comes from. 

I know I can be awfully opinionated at times. But really? This is what they're using our membership fees for? How about some new collections. Or how about a full text scan on unindexed collections, like FamilySearch released. How about doing something to improve user experience with member trees? And I can't help but wonder, is this change what's causing the hinting feature to be unavailable so often? The last week or so (right about when this change rolled out to me) I started spending a lot of  time endlessly refreshing trying to get hints to load. Maddening! Maddening I say!!  

Image by Patrisia Novianti from Pixabay

30 June 2024

5 Star Posts Week of 06/23/2024 - 06/29/2024

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
Staying abreast of happenings in the genealogy community is vitally important to me. There are hundreds of posts each week to sift through, on a wide variety of relevant topics. I'm so thankful to all the geneabloggers (and other content creators) who educate, enlighten and entertain me by sharing not only their stories but information I need to know.

Below are a few of the posts I think deserve "5 stars" this week and I'd like to share them with you.

7 RESOURCES FOR FINDING VINTAGE IMAGES OF PLACES IN YOUR FAMILY TREE by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

Rubber Meets Road, Genealogy Style by Jacqi Stevens on A Family Tapestry

Part Two: Using AI in Genealogy Research Best Practices by Legacy Tree Genealogists on Legacy Tree

Ancestry Pro Tools’ Enhanced Shared Matches: Is It Worth $10 per Month? by byRick T. Wilson, Ph.D. on My Family Pattern

A Sense of Place by Jacqi Stevens on A Family Tapestry

My Take on Ancestry ProTools by Jim Bartlett on esgment-ology

Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:

Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 23 to 29 June 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings

Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

This week’s crème de la crème — June 29, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

27 June 2024

Genealogy Heroes: Volunteers, Angels and Helpers

Image created with DALL-E and ChatGPT
There are so many wonderful and giving genealogists out there who make it their mission to help others. I'm always amazed at how giving and warm most genealogists are. Just researching your own tree could be a full time job for...well, basically forever! It's hard to imagine the time and effort these volunteers give on top of their own research. 

Here are just a few of many great projects I've heard of:

  • Search Angels is a non-profit organization assisting with genealogy and DNA test results for those in search of their biological family roots (basic adoptive search is free)
  • Family Treasures Found works to reunite lost treasures with their families
  • Megan Smolenyak has researched and helped identify 188 soldiers of various US wars. For 25 years, she's assisted the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) with identification of soldiers who gave their lives in war, but had not yet been accounted for
  • DNA Doe Project has a mission to identify John and Jane Does using investigative genetic genealogy
  • Random Acts of Genealogical Kindness (RAOGK) is a place where volunteers offer to provide research time (without charge) to researchers who need "boots on the ground" genealogy help in a distant location
  • 10 Million Names is dedicated to recovering the names of the estimated 10 million men, women, and children of African descent who were enslaved in pre- and post-colonial America
  • Project Infant a site dedicated to every victim of the Mother & Baby Homes in Ireland
If you're thinking of giving of your time, in addition to the above projects, here are a couple ideas almost any of us can do:
For more ideas and sites: 
While we all give in our own way, preserving and telling the stories of our ancestors - volunteers, helpers and angels are the unsung genealogy heroes. From transcribing documents to adding photos, I'd venture every one of us has benefited from the generosity of these amazing people. We may know some of their names, others remain in the shadows. If you're keen to give back to the genealogy community, take a few moments to look through some of these projects and ideas.

I've added a Volunteer Opportunities section on my Genealogy Toolbox page where you can find all of these links easily.

25 June 2024

DNA Connections - All Those Cousins

Image created using DALL-E and ChatGPT
I know a lot of people message their DNA matches and then...crickets. No reply. They try again, with the same results. Some people post about reaching out to tens or hundreds with limited results. Reaching out to newfound family is exciting, we hope we'll get a response and forge new friendships, or at least answer the question of where they fall in our family tree. For some, the requests are more pressing, such as trying to track down biological relatives totally unknown to them.

I've been relatively lucky in this respect. I've had a few people reach out to me, and I've always taken time to respond. In a few cases, they were reaching out because of findings in my tree (not because of DNA), and sometimes I believed they were incorrect. Other times, they were DNA matches trying to find the connection or just saying hello and introducing themselves. Some of these interactions have created friendships and lasting communications. Others were simply a brief passing encounter. Once, I even had someone who strives to return old photos to family reach out. While the person was in my tree, they married in and I didn't feel I was the best person to receive the photos.

Recently, a conversation with someone on my ex-husband's line made me realize I had an error in my tree (EEK!). I was so glad to discover this before I'd spent countless hours adding more incorrect people. She was so gentle when she told me how so many folks had the wrong parents attributed to a specific person. I had made the same mistake. Thankfully, it was only set of parents I hadn't added much data to. But, I was clearly incorrect when I looked more closely at the facts I'd found and a date discrepancy I'd failed to notice. The son in question is purported to have been orphaned and grew up with others, and the details on his true parents are scarce right now. I made the same error many others had, but close re-examination proved I needed to remove them from from my tree. Were it not for the DNA match who responded, I might never have realized my error.

I've also reached out to a few of my matches. Some have responded, some have not. I'm not in a position, as those who don't know their biological family may be, where these interactions are somewhat more critical to finding family. I generally have a specific reason to reach out to my matches. And I'm always very thankful when they respond. Unfortunately, most responses haven't provided me with a ton of new clues. But I still enjoyed "meeting" my newfound family members.

But may people never respond. I see lots of posts where people are frustrated and don't understand why they can't get answers. There can be so many reasons someone may not reply. Maybe they took a test at the request of a family member and have no interest on their own in genealogy. Maybe they received results they weren't expecting and haven't had time to process, or don't want to process. Maybe life is in the way and they don't have time to pursue their results. Maybe they started to research and found genealogy wasn't for them. Maybe they've passed away. Or maybe, they prefer to pursue their research in a solitary manner and don't want to talk to others. There are probably hundreds more reasons people might not answer. And really, it doesn't matter the reason. There is no right or wrong here. Only what we want or hope to happen, and what actually happens.

I think it's important to remember, the genealogy community is generally a very welcoming and wonderful group of people. Just because someone doesn't respond to a message, we shouldn't take it personally. Be thankful for the people who do respond. And don't give up! If you're a person who likes to reach out to your DNA matches, keep doing it! You never know when you might receive a response leading to a new friendship, more family or break down a brick wall. 

23 June 2024

5 Star Posts Week of 06/16/2024 - 06/22/2024

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
Staying abreast of happenings in the genealogy community is vitally important to me. There are hundreds of posts each week to sift through, on a wide variety of relevant topics. I'm so thankful to all the geneabloggers (and other content creators) who educate, enlighten and entertain me by sharing not only their stories but information I need to know.

Below are a few of the posts I think deserve "5 stars" this week and I'd like to share them with you.

Enhanced Search Capabilities Added to OldNews.com by Erica on MyHeritage Blog

Hone Your Genealogy Skills With Free Summer Online Education Opportunities by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

Big change for how some users will see the shared matches tool on AncestryDNA by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte

Researching the Ancestry of Formerly-Enslaved African American Families, Part 1: Up to the 1870 Brick Wall byaul Heinegg and Ayo Heinegg Magwood on FamilyTreeDNA Blog

Finally, a Reason to Get Ancestry Pro Tools! by Kitty Cooper on Kitty Cooper's Blog

EXPLORING LESS COMMON GENEALOGY WEBSITES, PART 2 by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

AncestryDNA Pro Tools - Shared Matches of Shared Matches Are Great! by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings

Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:

Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 16 to 22 June 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings

Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

This week’s crème de la crème — June 22, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

21 June 2024

Ancetry ProTools Are Improving But the Elite Tree Badge Is Deceiving

I'm striving for 0 people without any documentation. When Ancestry rolled out “Top Trees” in ProTools, I had 66 individuals needing another look, and I've been slowly whittling away at them.

I often add an unknown male spouse’s surname based on Social Security notes or wives listed in obits with a married name. Less frequently, the information comes from a will. On rare occasions, it’s to add a parent one generation back so I can add siblings of the known person in my tree (again, usually from obits). I also add unknown children (though where possible, I've been documenting those based on 1900 and 1910 census records showing number of children born and number of living children).

I’ve been working through those 66 people, and I’m pleased to say I have it down to 21! I figured I'd have the same 9.9 Top Tree rating until I reached 0. Imagine my surprise when my badge changed to Elite! Less than 1% of those in my tree have no sources (actually 8/10ths of 1% for any other OCD folks out there.)

Now, I’m down to the more difficult ones. A few are spouses where the marriage apparently didn’t last long they're proving problematic to find. Even my living people search tricks aren’t doing me much good. None of the names in question are showing up as family or associates. Some are several generations back and I may only have a given name with no surname, or a surname with various iterations and I'm not sure of the correct one yet. My progress on this task has slowed significantly, but hasn't come to halt yet. ProTools gives me a goal, and I like the challenge.

It’s important to remember, the badge on an Ancestry tree currently does not in any way indicate accuracy. It’s simply a reflection of whether there's at least one piece of documentation. It doesn't mean the documentation is correct. In the future, I hope it will reflect those researchers who try hard to make sure their trees are really accurate. Right now, it would be very easy for someone to have this badge but still have significant errors in their tree. For me, I know I tried to make sure I’m very accurate (or at least as accurate as I believe I can be), so it’s meaningful to me personally even if others shouldn't necessarily take it at face value. As always, don't simply copy the work of another (no matter what you may believe about the accuracy of their tree). Do the research yourself and make sure everything lines up. At some point, you'll be very glad you took the time to do so.

I'm finding Ancestry's ProTools is improving little by little. With the added filtering now available in Tree Checker, and the advantage of the new DNA feature showing how your shared matches are related to each other, the cost is becoming more palatable. And for those who've been invited to work on the trees of others, I understand your ProTools will work in those trees as well. But if you have ProTools and someone you invite to work on your tree does not have them, they do not "inherit" them when working in your tree. They only work for you. I hope Ancestry continues to roll out even more features in the future. I wasn't a fan when the first limited features were released, but I'm starting to warm up to ProTools now!

18 June 2024

Don't Make Assumptions

Image created using DALL-E and ChatGPT
Common advice is to start your tree with yourself, adding your parents and grandparents and then working back (or sideways or down) however you want to proceed. When I started my tree, hints for myself were primarily school yearbooks and a few public records. For my dad, there were draft cards and census records. Both immediately made me understand there are "facts" people probably get wrong when taking details from these records (if they trust the checkboxes presented when saving facts on Ancestry).

I went to a private school, not far from my home. But if you were to save the location of this school as my residence (as Ancestry helpfully suggests), you'd be wrong. The school is listed in one town, when I really lived in an adjoining town. I made a mental note never to accept the helpful checkboxes Ancestry shows when saving a hint, and to mine my details before I save each record. It takes longer, but it makes for a more accurate tree. (For yearbooks, I choose to enter a fact about education so I can record the location of the school).

Likewise, when working with draft cards, I have to ask myself where did the facts from this record really happen? Certainly the residence should be correct, but the other information? Unlike residence, vitals like height, weight, eye color, etc were most likely taken at the spot the draft card was filled out. The employer (if listed) might have a different location from the residence or where the card was filled in. I enter each detail based on the location I believe to be accurate for the specific fact, I don't lump them all into the same place.

Even SSDI records can be a little different. Sure, last benefit and last residence may be shown, but it doesn't mean it's where a person died...it's simply where they probably lived before their death. I've found deaths that occurred at home, yes. But they also happen at hospitals, nursing facilities, and even while away on travel or in an accident.

Obits are a treasure trove of facts. But the obit "happened" at the location it was published, while the facts contained in the obit likely happened elsewhere (possibly many different locations). The same goes for baptism records. It may be the closest you can come to a birth date (especially prior to births being recorded). But if all you have is a baptism, you only know the date the person was baptized, unless it happens to state the date of birth. Baptisms could happen days to years after birth (and in some religions, it happens in adulthood). And the place the baptism happened may or may not be where the family actually lived. A church may have been in a nearby parish or town. 

Public records, voter registrations and censuses are a little better. They're typically recording something happening at a specific place and possibly time. Likewise, marriage records are fairly accurate. But while a marriage license may show where a couple intended to marry, if there's no return of the license, you can't assume the marriage actually took place. Is it likely, sure. Is it guaranteed, no. Even with a returned license, the marriage may not have happened in the same place the license was issued.

The point of this post is to ask yourself "where did this fact happen?" Many times, it absolutely will be the same as the helpful checkboxes, but sometimes it isn't, or you may simply not know. It's incumbent on each of us as researchers to ask the questions and record the facts as best we can. Don't simply take information on a screen at face value when saving hints. Don't make assumptions. You only know what you know.

16 June 2024

5 Star Posts Week of 06/09/2024 - 06/15/2024

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
Staying abreast of happenings in the genealogy community is vitally important to me. There are hundreds of posts each week to sift through, on a wide variety of relevant topics. I'm so thankful to all the geneabloggers (and other content creators) who educate, enlighten and entertain me by sharing not only their stories but information I need to know.

Below are a few of the posts I think deserve "5 stars" this week and I'd like to share them with you.

The Accuracy of Inherited Genealogy by James Tanner on The Family History Guide Blog (originally posted on Genealogy's Star)

Avoiding Extremism: The Use and Disclosure of AI in Genealogy by Steve Little on AI Genealogy Insights

Guest Post: Where Did My AncestryDNA "Common Ancestors" Matches Go? by Marshall Clow on Genea-Musings

Genealogy Tips: Land Records by Katie Rebecca Garner on GenealogyBank.com

The Haunting Trial of Zona Heaster Shue by Nancy Richmond on Ancestral Findings

Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:

Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 9 to 15 June 2024   by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings

Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

This week’s crème de crème — June 15, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

14 June 2024

Biggest Brick Wall: Abijah LeRoy

Image by Ray Shrewsberry • from Pixabay
I've had a solid brick wall at my maternal 2nd great-grandparents since the day I started researching, over 10 years ago. My research started with a family story (now disproven by DNA). The Native American connection I spent years searching for does not exist. My maternal DNA shows primarily England, as well as  Sweden/Denmark, Scotland, Ireland and Norway. Once I had my DNA results in hand, I mistakenly thought removing Native American heritage from the equation was going to lead me somewhere fast. Boy was I wrong. It's like this couple was never born, they seem to appear out of thin air.

The known, my 2nd great grandparents had 6 children. Part of this comes from an elusive message board post about a family bible....though there is no documentation to substantiate, and no information on where I might find a copy of this bible. But, in conjunction with viable census records, the names seem to be accurate (as far as I can tell, one census has nothing but initials for given and middle names but they do line up pretty well.). I've pieced together the following children:

  1. Elizann E LeRoy (1839– )
  2. Amos Jasper LeRoy (1840–1904)
  3. W A LeRoy (1842– )  "A" may stand for Abijah or Arthur
  4. Benjamin Franklin LeRoy (1843–possibly1900)
  5. Elizabeth Jane LeRoy (1844– )
  6. John Robert LeRoy (1847–1927) -  my great-grandfather
From the census records and death certificate of John Robert LeRoy, I believe my 2nd great grandmother was Nancy Williams (possibly middle name Jane if you believe an 1870 census with Benjamin and John in the household also showing someone named Jane and being the correct age). From the same death certificate, his father was listed as Abijob LeRoy. However, other family lore shows Abijah, so I choose to use it (for now, cause I'm not at all convinced it was his given name at all). Abijah does not appear in any census records I can find. 


I've seen old Ancestry message board posts with others looking for Abijah, with the same Native American story in their family lore. Every tree I look at has him listed with no viable documentation, other than the death certificate of his son I've already located. In some trees, Abijah is shown as John or Luke. His father is sometimes attributed as John. But in NONE of the trees do I find any useful documentation. Sure there is an 1830 census record for a John LeRoy in Georgia (where I know he lived), but there's nothing show it's the LeRoy I'm looking for. And at best, I'll still only have numbers of people of various age ranges in the household. It's before the birth of his children...so...no clues to match with anything else. I'm not at all comfortable at this juncture using the 1830 census for anything. 

You'd think DNA results might point me in a direction right? Nope! I have 42 matches to the supposed Abijah (or Abijob or John or Luke) LeRoy and Nancy Williams. I have 39 matches to his supposed father, John. Nothing else. No DNA matches to an as of yet unidentified child from the father John. Everything ends with Abijah and Nancy. To make it more frustrating, all my DNA matches to Abijah are from his sons only (leaving me with questions about his daughters, since they have very similar names and could end up being the same person). It seems strange for a time period around the early 1800's not to have matches to some other children of Abijah's father. Why is Abijah the only child of theirs with DNA matches? Sure, it could be no one has tested. It could be the parents died and he was orphaned...or he legitimately may have been the only offspring (although I tend to doubt this). It just seems very odd to me. 

I've searched all kinds of different ways. I've only found one obit for a child of Abijah and there's no mention of the parents (but it does verify some of his siblings). The death certificate I've located is the only one I've found for any child showing parents. The one brother with the obit did have a death entry but it was just a record book, and parents weren't listed. The obit, from Tennessee, did say the son (Amos) was born in Banks, Georgia...while the majority of records I have are from Whitfield, Georgia... but it hasn't unearthed any new clues for me. All of the children were born prior to the start of birth records in Georgia.

With all my subscriptions, you'd think I'd be able to find obits for a few more of his children. Though, even if I did, they might not mention parents. Southern records of the time are less than detailed. I've considered some records might have been destroyed. And while the FamilySearch wiki shows the Whitfield, Georgia county courthouse was burned in 1864, there was no reported loss of records. I've also considered the family may have migrated from another state (I already know the family lived in and around Georgia and Alabama, but some also lived in Tennessee or had records created there), but broadening searches to nearby states has yielded nothing. FamilySearch shows Abijah born in South Carolina, but there's no documentation there either, save for the same single death certificate of John Robert. 

I checked for any wars during the time I suspect he lived, and the only one was the Mexican-American war. It seems unlikely he'd have had any reason to leave Georgia for this event. There were certainly lots of diseases at the time, he may have died....but there's no burial I can find. He may have left the family and started over under a new name (his son Amos left his family for a time per his obit, but eventually returned), but why no records before then? Perhaps the surname should be LeCroy, Leeroy, Lerry, Lukeroy (yes, I've seen records with all kinds of spellings) or even Lecroix. I've used wildcards and "sounds like" with no success. I'm finding nothing...nothing!...to connect any dots. 

The FamilySearch full text search potentially yielded some Whitfield Georgia deeds with LeRoy's in the right time frame (1850's range) when I "think" Abijah may have died based on no children born after 1847, but to be honest, there were quite a few with the same or similar names (none of them being Abijah or Nancy). Most are showing a John receiving the property, and there's nothing at all to suggest the John in these records is my great-grandfather. Amos and Benjamin were farmers for a time per non-population schedules and property tax digests. The property tax digests just confuse things more because there's one from 1873-1877 showing both a Benjamin and Luke in Cobb, Georgia. But Benjamin is sometimes called Luke (and unless he had multiple personalities, he can't be both Benjamin and Luke on the same record, and there's no other brother named Luke). The record is well after I believe Abijah to have died. I'm not finding deeds with the names I'd expect, and there's nothing in those deeds to help terribly much. I am not skilled with land records and deeds, but I may have to spend some time on them just to disprove them. 

Could it be there simply aren't records? I tend to doubt it. Sure, the southern states do seem to be more scarce on documentation than say Ohio (who kept wonderful records) but I feel like I just haven't found the right search yet. The family was scattered across Georgia, Alabama and Tennessee during the time. Maybe I'm just being too narrowminded. And don't forget thet bible published in Louisiana and the Louisiana Confederate money I found clearing out my parents house. Maybe they're a clue? So far, I've not tied the family at all to Louisiana, though there was a big LeRoy presence there, but they primarily hailed from France where I have no known DNA ties on the maternal side. To be fair, there could be a French connection not indicated by DNA, but I can only use the known, and France isn't part of the equation at this point.

So my brick wall still stands firm. I'm constantly thinking about other approaches to break it down, but so far nothing has worked. I kick my toe painfully against this wall every couple of weeks, but it refuses to crack. I won't give up, one day I'm confident I'll find the record I need and when I do, it'll be the biggest genealogy happy dance ever!

11 June 2024

Talk to the Tree?

Image by Ryan McGuire from Pixabay
I'm sitting here wondering if anyone else ever talks to the people in their tree? Or am I just weird? Not pick up the phone, sending an Ancestry message or writing an email talk...I mean talking to the names on the screen as you work on them.

The other day, I was trying to find the given name of a (presumably) living husband in my tree. I'd added him based on the wife's surname shown in one of her parent's obits. More often than not, people I add this way have hints show up or I can tease out the answer relatively easily. But a few are proving very stubborn and I'm spending quite a lot of time trying to pin them down.

So I was researching...clicking thru various search results...refining my searches and trying again...and again. I looked on FamilyTreeNow.com, hoping he'd show up in family or known associates of the wife or their children. Frustratingly, nothing was working. 

Then, as if by magic (well, actually it was the magic of searching for a specific street address in the keywords search field of public records), I found the record I was searching for! I can show the person lived at the same address as the wife. And I had a given name! 

Without missing a beat, I caught myself whispering under my breath "...there you are...", as if he had simply been hiding just out of view, like a naughty child. Is it just me or do you occasionally talk to the people in your tree? (And just to be clear - no, they don't talk back). 

Image by Ryan McGuire from Pixabay

09 June 2024

5 Star Posts Week of 06/02/2024 - 06/08/2024

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
Staying abreast of happenings in the genealogy community is vitally important to me. There are hundreds of posts each week to sift through, on a wide variety of relevant topics. I'm so thankful to all the geneabloggers (and other content creators) who educate, enlighten and entertain me by sharing not only their stories but information I need to know.

Below are a few of the posts I think deserve "5 stars" this week and I'd like to share them with you.

Low Matches Lie on The DNA Geek

Shared Segments for Small Segments by Jim Bartlett on segment-ology

101 Best Genealogy Websites of 2024 on Family Tree Magazine

7 ways to save money while researching your family history by Sarah Williams on Who Do You Think You Are Magazine

Exploring Less Common Genealogy Websites by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:

Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 2 to 8 June 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings

Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree

This week’s crème de la crème — June 8, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

06 June 2024

To Prove or Disprove

Prove vs disprove
Image created using DALL-E and ChatGPT
There are days when I just can't start working on a record I know is going to take a long time to finish. For whatever reason, I just don't have the focus in the given moment or there's a time constraint. But at the same time, I still want to do something....anything...to further my research. I make working on my tree a part of almost every day, even if it's only reviewing a few hints.

So, on days like today, I occasionally make my focus disproving hints. Rather than clicking endlessly thru screens and not doing anything at all, I'll set my focus on weeding out hints I don't believe are valuable (typically copies of user uploaded documents I already have in my hints) or ignoring those I determine don't pertain to the person in my tree. This sounds pretty easy right? Well, sometimes it's not. Matching up images to hints is fairly straightforward. If the image is the same as the image in a hint - ignore the uploaded one and use the hint. But looking at multiple census records where the name appears right, but the various years show different parents, different relationships or even a significant change in location, can take more time. In these cases, I click thru to the hint and start evaluating the other potential hints Ancestry helpfully shows in the sidebar. I try to find if the details on those other hints line up with my tree, or don't line up at all. I start looking for how the puzzle pieces fit (or in some cases, don't fit).

While I might not want to spend an hour mining details from a census record I know is correct, I might easily spend an hour clicking back and forth thru various hints, looking for the clue it's not the right person. I find I encounter this a far more often as I push back further in the direct lines. As records become more scarce, and names are common and repetitive in the location I'm searching, narrowing down the right records can be a head scratcher.

As an example, let's take Henry Jackson (1768-1854), the 5th great grandfather of my ex-husband. I know he was born in Maryland and died in Kentucky. Most of my knowledge of him comes from letters written by family years ago and research done by other family members. Thankfully, memories were preserved and shared, and copies of original documents not currently available as hints were uploaded. He appears to have been a caring individual. Records show in 1825, he was responsible for the son of a "poor free man of color" until the boy reached the age of 21. In 1833, another poor woman (relationship unknown) was placed under his care by the court. Records also show he emancipated two woman of color in 1838. These documents are all from the same location he lived and died in Kentucky and provide some idea of his character. There's even a copy of his will uploaded for me to pour over (with his daughter's married name, so I know I'm on the right track)....though it may also be available via the FamilySearch Full Text Search now, to save my poor eyes from deciphering the handwriting. 

So, I know a reasonable amount about his later life. Then I switch over to the record hints I can see. There certainly are several early census records, but they don't list all the household members by name, and some of the counties are different than where he lived later. I don't yet know his parents or siblings, so I'm currently at a disadvantage. There's also a FindAGrave record, right name, different county (but the same different county as some of the census records) with a different spouse (sadly, no birth or death date). It's quite likely he did have another earlier spouse, as when his will was written he had many married children and an also an young daughter he was leaving in the care of one of his grown daughters. But is the FindAGrave record right? Just because the location matches a questionable census record doesn't make it so. And there's nothing yet to prove the name of another spouse. I'm still poking around with Henry's records. I'm not confident enough yet to attach or ignore them, but the investigation is gratifying.

In some ways, disproving a record is just as satisfying for me as finding a valid record, especially when it comes to the farther back generations. None of us wants to spend countless hours documenting the incorrect person. I try to make notes why I finally decided to disprove a record. Doing so saves me time if similar records or information pop up again. Just today, I had notes where an ancestor is associated in many trees with a particular husband. But in my research, I was satisfied this was not the same person as is in my tree. Not only did I make a note to remind myself of this, I had the foresight to include a link to the census record I ultimately used to make the determination. In this case, it was an 1880 census showing her as married to a man with the surname McBriant (the name in many trees), but she was actually married a man with the surname LeRoy a couple years before and was having children with him in 1880 (and I have DNA matches from, and a paper trail to, this union). So the 1880 record disproves McBriant as a spouse entirely. I was able to eliminate several other hints today based on my notes disproving McBriant.

So...on days when recording details may not be an option (whatever the reason), progress can still be made by disproving records. Weeding out the unrelated to allow the rest of the records shine through is still a research win in my book!