Image by No-longer-here from Pixabay
Honoring those memorialized in family trees everywhere...and the ones yet to be discovered. Sharing inspiration, information & opinions for the journey finding family.
24 December 2024
Balancing Life, Health, Work and Family Through the Generations
23 July 2024
Pressing Pause
21 July 2024
5 Star Posts Week of 07/14/2024 - 07/20/2024
New: Relationship Diagram Now Supports Very Large Family Trees by Daniella on MyHeritage Blog
Are Ancestry Pro Tools Worth the Money? by DiAnn Iamarino Ohama on Fortify Your Family Tree
Same Family, New Tree: MyHeritage Brings Its Family Tree Tools to FamilyTreeDNA by Katy Rowe-Schurwanz on FamilyTreeDNA
Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 14 to 20 July 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings
Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
This week’s crème de la crème — July 20, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay17 July 2024
A Small But Useful Change to Custom Facts on Ancestry
| Ancestry Custom Event |
Last night, I added an Obituary custom fact to one of the people in my tree. When I went to attach the facts to the source, imagine my surprise! I could see the title - Obituary! I was so surprised, I thought perhaps my eyes deceived me! So I added a custom "test" fact (shown below):
16 July 2024
Atlas of Historical County Boundaries
From the website:
The Atlas of Historical County Boundaries is meant to be a resource for people seeking records of past events, and people trying to analyze, interpret and display county-based historical data like returns of elections and censuses, and for people working on state and local history projects.
The core of the site is the interactive map (conveniently located on the homepage). You can easily explore historical boundary changes over time, as well as find much more detailed information on these changes. There are detailed instructions (along with videos) on using and navigating the maps. And there's a FAQ section for additional information. They also provide downloadable GIS, KMZ, and PDF files with explanations on the uses of these files.
Searching is simple and straightforward. Just click on a state from the map on the main page or use the search box to select one. You'll be presented with maps, indexes, chronology, sources, commentary and downloads. Each section is clearly indicated and they're all displayed on one page for easy access. Within the maps, you can further select a time period for the historical borders you want to learn about (one of the best parts of the site!) Using my home state of Maryland as an example, I could see boundary changes ranging from 1638-1997. I can't fit all the date changes into a single image because there are so many it needs a slider, but this gives you an idea of how it appears. (For such a small state, we sure had a lot of boundary changes.) Having all this information in a single, easy to use place is just the kind of tool I need!The county chronologies include dates of creation, name changes, and boundary adjustments. This helps genealogists and family historians identify where records may be located over differing time periods. This can be helpful when searching for censuses, land deeds, probate records and much more. Each state has a historical commentary section providing context and further explanation for boundary changes. Understanding why boundaries changed may offer further insight into historical events impacting your ancestors lives (including why they may have migrated to other areas).
Maps will probably never be my favorite research tool. But as with all tools, it's important to know they exist and the times we may want to use them. One could search for ages for records in a given area, but if the particular location wasn't the same in the past, all those search efforts may be in vain. Finding a city shifted counties in the past could potentially be a brick wall buster! By utilizing the Atlas of Historical County Boundaries (linked in my Genealogy Toolbox under Mapping) you can enhance your family history research, gaining a clearer picture of where to find historical records and understanding the geographic context of your ancestors’ lives.
Image by pinkzebra from Pixabay14 July 2024
5 Star Posts Week of 07/07/2024 - 07/13/2024
Facing uncertainty by Daniel Loftus on Dan's Thinktank
DNA and Law Enforcement by Kitty Cooper on Kitty Cooper's Blog
Southern Militia Ancestors Hiding in the Bush by Kathleen Brandt on a3Genealogy
While We're Melting by Jacqi Stevens on A Family Tapestry
The most ancient human genome yet has been sequenced—and it’s a Denisovan’s by Ann Gibbons on Science.org
Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 7 to 13 July 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings
Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
This week’s crème de la crème — July 13, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay11 July 2024
Pursuing Knowledge in Genealogy and More on ThoughtCo
While the link I've included above takes you directly to the genealogy section, if you go to ThoughtCo's homepage, you can select from many, many other categories and topics. Genealogy is found by clicking on Humanities > History & Culture > Genealogy.
They offer articles on genealogy basics, researching in specific areas, tools and how-to's, working with photos, DNA, reunions and the list goes on and on. There's even one article on The Cherokee Princess Myth I wish I'd read before I started my journey. Articles link to additional sites as well as other articles on ThoughCo, so you can continue to expand your knowledge. The writers for this site have advanced degrees in their subject areas, and collectively they've written over 40,000 articles!
Once you start reading, you may find yourself clicking through to all kinds of interesting topics! Expand the Genealogy section and you'll find subtopics of Basics, Surnames, Genealogy Fun and Vital Records Around the World. Each section has dozens upon dozens of articles. Conveniently, they also have a number of history sections from specific places to time periods. Combine this with the genealogy articles, and you may find yourself tumbling down the rabbit-hole for hours!
I've included ThoughCo.com in my Genealogy Toolbox under Articles, Tips/Tricks, Guides. I hope you'll take a few minutes (or hours if you have time to spare) to check ToughtCo out. Leave a comment or connect with me on social media and let me know what you think of the site.
Image by Pablo chaves from Pixabay09 July 2024
Comparing Text
The other day, I was working with an ancestor who had several different obituaries published (in different newspapers and online). Obits can be substantially the same or they can be vastly different. Since they take a long time to mine details from, I wanted a way to see the differences. It they were identical (without having to read a few words at at time to compare), I'd know I didn't need to "re-mine" a particular version of the obit. And if the copy I worked from contained all the pertinent details also shown in another version, linking it would be much faster as I wouldn't need to create additional new facts (though I'd still need to link all the matching ones).
I set off to find some free online tools for making the comparison:
- Diffchecker.com - Compare text, images, Word, PDF, Excel to a like file. Differences are highlighted for easy recognition. While additions and deletions are highlighted, it takes looking at both to spot all the differences.
- GoTranscript - Easy to use, offers option to ignore capitalization and punctuation. Additions and deletions are clearly identified by color in one spot, making it easier to see the differences.
- SEO Magnifier - Allows comparison of text via copy/paste, URL or documents. Accurate, and easy to spot deletions, but additions are slightly less pronounces.
07 July 2024
5 Star Posts Week of 06/20/2024 - 07/06/2024
Ancestry ProTools - Family Tree Fan Chart by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings
Top 5 DNA Genealogy Testing Sites by Diane Henriks on Know Who Wears the Genes in Your Family
JULY TECH MOMENT: SNAGIT by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
Who provides the most value? DNA testing and Beyond by Valorie Zimmerman on South King County Genealogical Society
Power-Up Your DNA Analyses by Leah Larkin on The DNA Geek
Pennsylvania Genealogy Research Guide by James M. Beidler on FamilyTree
Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 30 June to 6 July 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings
Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
This week’s crème de la crème — July 6, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay04 July 2024
Share Your Journey This Independence Day
Image by free stock photos from www.picjumbo.com from Pixabay
02 July 2024
OCD and the New Hinting for Ancestry Member Trees
30 June 2024
5 Star Posts Week of 06/23/2024 - 06/29/2024
7 RESOURCES FOR FINDING VINTAGE IMAGES OF PLACES IN YOUR FAMILY TREE by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
Rubber Meets Road, Genealogy Style by Jacqi Stevens on A Family Tapestry
Part Two: Using AI in Genealogy Research Best Practices by Legacy Tree Genealogists on Legacy Tree
Ancestry Pro Tools’ Enhanced Shared Matches: Is It Worth $10 per Month? by byRick T. Wilson, Ph.D. on My Family Pattern
A Sense of Place by Jacqi Stevens on A Family Tapestry
My Take on Ancestry ProTools by Jim Bartlett on esgment-ology
Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 23 to 29 June 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings
Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
This week’s crème de la crème — June 29, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay27 June 2024
Genealogy Heroes: Volunteers, Angels and Helpers
![]() |
| Image created with DALL-E and ChatGPT |
Here are just a few of many great projects I've heard of:
- Search Angels is a non-profit organization assisting with genealogy and DNA test results for those in search of their biological family roots (basic adoptive search is free)
- Family Treasures Found works to reunite lost treasures with their families
- Megan Smolenyak has researched and helped identify 188 soldiers of various US wars. For 25 years, she's assisted the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) with identification of soldiers who gave their lives in war, but had not yet been accounted for
- DNA Doe Project has a mission to identify John and Jane Does using investigative genetic genealogy
- Random Acts of Genealogical Kindness (RAOGK) is a place where volunteers offer to provide research time (without charge) to researchers who need "boots on the ground" genealogy help in a distant location
- 10 Million Names is dedicated to recovering the names of the estimated 10 million men, women, and children of African descent who were enslaved in pre- and post-colonial America
- Project Infant a site dedicated to every victim of the Mother & Baby Homes in Ireland
- Assist with indexing, transcribing and proof-reading: Family Search has a whole page of volunteer opportunities
- Volunteer with a genealogical society such as the National Genealogical Society (NGS) or American Ancestors or ask your local genealogical society how you can volunteer with them
- Take photos or transcribe for BillionGraves or FindAGrave
- Check out Cyndi's List for sites working to return reunite old photos with their family and other lost and found projects
- Investigate the numerous volunteer projects on Cyndi's List
- Browse Facebook groups - there are tons of them depending on your area of interest
25 June 2024
DNA Connections - All Those Cousins
![]() |
| Image created using DALL-E and ChatGPT |
I've been relatively lucky in this respect. I've had a few people reach out to me, and I've always taken time to respond. In a few cases, they were reaching out because of findings in my tree (not because of DNA), and sometimes I believed they were incorrect. Other times, they were DNA matches trying to find the connection or just saying hello and introducing themselves. Some of these interactions have created friendships and lasting communications. Others were simply a brief passing encounter. Once, I even had someone who strives to return old photos to family reach out. While the person was in my tree, they married in and I didn't feel I was the best person to receive the photos.
Recently, a conversation with someone on my ex-husband's line made me realize I had an error in my tree (EEK!). I was so glad to discover this before I'd spent countless hours adding more incorrect people. She was so gentle when she told me how so many folks had the wrong parents attributed to a specific person. I had made the same mistake. Thankfully, it was only set of parents I hadn't added much data to. But, I was clearly incorrect when I looked more closely at the facts I'd found and a date discrepancy I'd failed to notice. The son in question is purported to have been orphaned and grew up with others, and the details on his true parents are scarce right now. I made the same error many others had, but close re-examination proved I needed to remove them from from my tree. Were it not for the DNA match who responded, I might never have realized my error.
I've also reached out to a few of my matches. Some have responded, some have not. I'm not in a position, as those who don't know their biological family may be, where these interactions are somewhat more critical to finding family. I generally have a specific reason to reach out to my matches. And I'm always very thankful when they respond. Unfortunately, most responses haven't provided me with a ton of new clues. But I still enjoyed "meeting" my newfound family members.
But may people never respond. I see lots of posts where people are frustrated and don't understand why they can't get answers. There can be so many reasons someone may not reply. Maybe they took a test at the request of a family member and have no interest on their own in genealogy. Maybe they received results they weren't expecting and haven't had time to process, or don't want to process. Maybe life is in the way and they don't have time to pursue their results. Maybe they started to research and found genealogy wasn't for them. Maybe they've passed away. Or maybe, they prefer to pursue their research in a solitary manner and don't want to talk to others. There are probably hundreds more reasons people might not answer. And really, it doesn't matter the reason. There is no right or wrong here. Only what we want or hope to happen, and what actually happens.
I think it's important to remember, the genealogy community is generally a very welcoming and wonderful group of people. Just because someone doesn't respond to a message, we shouldn't take it personally. Be thankful for the people who do respond. And don't give up! If you're a person who likes to reach out to your DNA matches, keep doing it! You never know when you might receive a response leading to a new friendship, more family or break down a brick wall.
23 June 2024
5 Star Posts Week of 06/16/2024 - 06/22/2024
Enhanced Search Capabilities Added to OldNews.com by Erica on MyHeritage Blog
Hone Your Genealogy Skills With Free Summer Online Education Opportunities by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
Big change for how some users will see the shared matches tool on AncestryDNA by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte
Researching the Ancestry of Formerly-Enslaved African American Families, Part 1: Up to the 1870 Brick Wall byaul Heinegg and Ayo Heinegg Magwood on FamilyTreeDNA Blog
Finally, a Reason to Get Ancestry Pro Tools! by Kitty Cooper on Kitty Cooper's Blog
EXPLORING LESS COMMON GENEALOGY WEBSITES, PART 2 by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
AncestryDNA Pro Tools - Shared Matches of Shared Matches Are Great! by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings
Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 16 to 22 June 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings
Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
This week’s crème de la crème — June 22, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay21 June 2024
Ancetry ProTools Are Improving But the Elite Tree Badge Is Deceiving
I’ve been working through those 66 people, and I’m pleased to say I have it down to 21! I figured I'd have the same 9.9 Top Tree rating until I reached 0. Imagine my surprise when my badge changed to Elite! Less than 1% of those in my tree have no sources (actually 8/10ths of 1% for any other OCD folks out there.)
Now, I’m down to the more difficult ones. A few are spouses where the marriage apparently didn’t last long they're proving problematic to find. Even my living people search tricks aren’t doing me much good. None of the names in question are showing up as family or associates. Some are several generations back and I may only have a given name with no surname, or a surname with various iterations and I'm not sure of the correct one yet. My progress on this task has slowed significantly, but hasn't come to halt yet. ProTools gives me a goal, and I like the challenge.
It’s important to remember, the badge on an Ancestry tree currently does not in any way indicate accuracy. It’s simply a reflection of whether there's at least one piece of documentation. It doesn't mean the documentation is correct. In the future, I hope it will reflect those researchers who try hard to make sure their trees are really accurate. Right now, it would be very easy for someone to have this badge but still have significant errors in their tree. For me, I know I tried to make sure I’m very accurate (or at least as accurate as I believe I can be), so it’s meaningful to me personally even if others shouldn't necessarily take it at face value. As always, don't simply copy the work of another (no matter what you may believe about the accuracy of their tree). Do the research yourself and make sure everything lines up. At some point, you'll be very glad you took the time to do so.
I'm finding Ancestry's ProTools is improving little by little. With the added filtering now available in Tree Checker, and the advantage of the new DNA feature showing how your shared matches are related to each other, the cost is becoming more palatable. And for those who've been invited to work on the trees of others, I understand your ProTools will work in those trees as well. But if you have ProTools and someone you invite to work on your tree does not have them, they do not "inherit" them when working in your tree. They only work for you. I hope Ancestry continues to roll out even more features in the future. I wasn't a fan when the first limited features were released, but I'm starting to warm up to ProTools now!
18 June 2024
Don't Make Assumptions
![]() |
| Image created using DALL-E and ChatGPT |
I went to a private school, not far from my home. But if you were to save the location of this school as my residence (as Ancestry helpfully suggests), you'd be wrong. The school is listed in one town, when I really lived in an adjoining town. I made a mental note never to accept the helpful checkboxes Ancestry shows when saving a hint, and to mine my details before I save each record. It takes longer, but it makes for a more accurate tree. (For yearbooks, I choose to enter a fact about education so I can record the location of the school).
Likewise, when working with draft cards, I have to ask myself where did the facts from this record really happen? Certainly the residence should be correct, but the other information? Unlike residence, vitals like height, weight, eye color, etc were most likely taken at the spot the draft card was filled out. The employer (if listed) might have a different location from the residence or where the card was filled in. I enter each detail based on the location I believe to be accurate for the specific fact, I don't lump them all into the same place.
Even SSDI records can be a little different. Sure, last benefit and last residence may be shown, but it doesn't mean it's where a person died...it's simply where they probably lived before their death. I've found deaths that occurred at home, yes. But they also happen at hospitals, nursing facilities, and even while away on travel or in an accident.
Obits are a treasure trove of facts. But the obit "happened" at the location it was published, while the facts contained in the obit likely happened elsewhere (possibly many different locations). The same goes for baptism records. It may be the closest you can come to a birth date (especially prior to births being recorded). But if all you have is a baptism, you only know the date the person was baptized, unless it happens to state the date of birth. Baptisms could happen days to years after birth (and in some religions, it happens in adulthood). And the place the baptism happened may or may not be where the family actually lived. A church may have been in a nearby parish or town.
Public records, voter registrations and censuses are a little better. They're typically recording something happening at a specific place and possibly time. Likewise, marriage records are fairly accurate. But while a marriage license may show where a couple intended to marry, if there's no return of the license, you can't assume the marriage actually took place. Is it likely, sure. Is it guaranteed, no. Even with a returned license, the marriage may not have happened in the same place the license was issued.
The point of this post is to ask yourself "where did this fact happen?" Many times, it absolutely will be the same as the helpful checkboxes, but sometimes it isn't, or you may simply not know. It's incumbent on each of us as researchers to ask the questions and record the facts as best we can. Don't simply take information on a screen at face value when saving hints. Don't make assumptions. You only know what you know.
16 June 2024
5 Star Posts Week of 06/09/2024 - 06/15/2024
The Accuracy of Inherited Genealogy by James Tanner on The Family History Guide Blog (originally posted on Genealogy's Star)
Avoiding Extremism: The Use and Disclosure of AI in Genealogy by Steve Little on AI Genealogy Insights
Guest Post: Where Did My AncestryDNA "Common Ancestors" Matches Go? by Marshall Clow on Genea-Musings
Genealogy Tips: Land Records by Katie Rebecca Garner on GenealogyBank.com
The Haunting Trial of Zona Heaster Shue by Nancy Richmond on Ancestral Findings
Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 9 to 15 June 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings
Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
This week’s crème de crème — June 15, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay14 June 2024
Biggest Brick Wall: Abijah LeRoy
The known, my 2nd great grandparents had 6 children. Part of this comes from an elusive message board post about a family bible....though there is no documentation to substantiate, and no information on where I might find a copy of this bible. But, in conjunction with viable census records, the names seem to be accurate (as far as I can tell, one census has nothing but initials for given and middle names but they do line up pretty well.). I've pieced together the following children:
- Elizann E LeRoy (1839– )
- Amos Jasper LeRoy (1840–1904)
- W A LeRoy (1842– ) "A" may stand for Abijah or Arthur
- Benjamin Franklin LeRoy (1843–possibly1900)
- Elizabeth Jane LeRoy (1844– )
- John Robert LeRoy (1847–1927) - my great-grandfather
11 June 2024
Talk to the Tree?
The other day, I was trying to find the given name of a (presumably) living husband in my tree. I'd added him based on the wife's surname shown in one of her parent's obits. More often than not, people I add this way have hints show up or I can tease out the answer relatively easily. But a few are proving very stubborn and I'm spending quite a lot of time trying to pin them down.
So I was researching...clicking thru various search results...refining my searches and trying again...and again. I looked on FamilyTreeNow.com, hoping he'd show up in family or known associates of the wife or their children. Frustratingly, nothing was working.
Then, as if by magic (well, actually it was the magic of searching for a specific street address in the keywords search field of public records), I found the record I was searching for! I can show the person lived at the same address as the wife. And I had a given name!
Without missing a beat, I caught myself whispering under my breath "...there you are...", as if he had simply been hiding just out of view, like a naughty child. Is it just me or do you occasionally talk to the people in your tree? (And just to be clear - no, they don't talk back).
Image by Ryan McGuire from Pixabay09 June 2024
5 Star Posts Week of 06/02/2024 - 06/08/2024
Low Matches Lie on The DNA Geek
Shared Segments for Small Segments by Jim Bartlett on segment-ology
101 Best Genealogy Websites of 2024 on Family Tree Magazine
7 ways to save money while researching your family history by Sarah Williams on Who Do You Think You Are Magazine
Exploring Less Common Genealogy Websites by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
Posts other Geneabloggers liked this week:Best of the Genea-Blogs - Week of 2 to 8 June 2024 by Randy Seaver on Genea-Musings
Friday Family History Finds by Linda Stufflebean on Empty Branches on the Family Tree
This week’s crème de la crème — June 8, 2024 by Gail Dever on Genealogy à la carte
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay06 June 2024
To Prove or Disprove
![]() |
| Image created using DALL-E and ChatGPT |
So, on days like today, I occasionally make my focus disproving hints. Rather than clicking endlessly thru screens and not doing anything at all, I'll set my focus on weeding out hints I don't believe are valuable (typically copies of user uploaded documents I already have in my hints) or ignoring those I determine don't pertain to the person in my tree. This sounds pretty easy right? Well, sometimes it's not. Matching up images to hints is fairly straightforward. If the image is the same as the image in a hint - ignore the uploaded one and use the hint. But looking at multiple census records where the name appears right, but the various years show different parents, different relationships or even a significant change in location, can take more time. In these cases, I click thru to the hint and start evaluating the other potential hints Ancestry helpfully shows in the sidebar. I try to find if the details on those other hints line up with my tree, or don't line up at all. I start looking for how the puzzle pieces fit (or in some cases, don't fit).
While I might not want to spend an hour mining details from a census record I know is correct, I might easily spend an hour clicking back and forth thru various hints, looking for the clue it's not the right person. I find I encounter this a far more often as I push back further in the direct lines. As records become more scarce, and names are common and repetitive in the location I'm searching, narrowing down the right records can be a head scratcher.
As an example, let's take Henry Jackson (1768-1854), the 5th great grandfather of my ex-husband. I know he was born in Maryland and died in Kentucky. Most of my knowledge of him comes from letters written by family years ago and research done by other family members. Thankfully, memories were preserved and shared, and copies of original documents not currently available as hints were uploaded. He appears to have been a caring individual. Records show in 1825, he was responsible for the son of a "poor free man of color" until the boy reached the age of 21. In 1833, another poor woman (relationship unknown) was placed under his care by the court. Records also show he emancipated two woman of color in 1838. These documents are all from the same location he lived and died in Kentucky and provide some idea of his character. There's even a copy of his will uploaded for me to pour over (with his daughter's married name, so I know I'm on the right track)....though it may also be available via the FamilySearch Full Text Search now, to save my poor eyes from deciphering the handwriting.
So, I know a reasonable amount about his later life. Then I switch over to the record hints I can see. There certainly are several early census records, but they don't list all the household members by name, and some of the counties are different than where he lived later. I don't yet know his parents or siblings, so I'm currently at a disadvantage. There's also a FindAGrave record, right name, different county (but the same different county as some of the census records) with a different spouse (sadly, no birth or death date). It's quite likely he did have another earlier spouse, as when his will was written he had many married children and an also an young daughter he was leaving in the care of one of his grown daughters. But is the FindAGrave record right? Just because the location matches a questionable census record doesn't make it so. And there's nothing yet to prove the name of another spouse. I'm still poking around with Henry's records. I'm not confident enough yet to attach or ignore them, but the investigation is gratifying.
In some ways, disproving a record is just as satisfying for me as finding a valid record, especially when it comes to the farther back generations. None of us wants to spend countless hours documenting the incorrect person. I try to make notes why I finally decided to disprove a record. Doing so saves me time if similar records or information pop up again. Just today, I had notes where an ancestor is associated in many trees with a particular husband. But in my research, I was satisfied this was not the same person as is in my tree. Not only did I make a note to remind myself of this, I had the foresight to include a link to the census record I ultimately used to make the determination. In this case, it was an 1880 census showing her as married to a man with the surname McBriant (the name in many trees), but she was actually married a man with the surname LeRoy a couple years before and was having children with him in 1880 (and I have DNA matches from, and a paper trail to, this union). So the 1880 record disproves McBriant as a spouse entirely. I was able to eliminate several other hints today based on my notes disproving McBriant.So...on days when recording details may not be an option (whatever the reason), progress can still be made by disproving records. Weeding out the unrelated to allow the rest of the records shine through is still a research win in my book!













